Join Us | Latest Articles | Contact

Journal Home

Editorial Board


Submit to this journal

Current issue

International Journal of Cancer and Clinical Research

DOI: 10.23937/2378-3419/3/4/1062

Cancer Risk among Physicians is Different from that among Non-Physicians: An Observational Pilot Study

Hyun Young Kim*

Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Korea

*Corresponding author: Hyun Young Kim, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, E-mail:
Int J Cancer Clin Res, IJCCR-3-062, (Volume 3, Issue 4), Pilot Study; ISSN: 2378-3419
Received: May 31, 2016 | Accepted: July 28, 2016 | Published: July 29, 2016
Citation: Kim HY (2016) Cancer Risk among Physicians is Different from that among Non-Physicians: An Observational Pilot Study. Int J Cancer Clin Res 3:062. 10.23937/2378-3419/3/4/1062
Copyright: © 2016 Kim HY. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


Introduction: Some controversy has existed concerning the cancer incidence rate among physicians and non-physicians. We investigated the cancer incidence rate among physicians compared to that in non-physicians.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective, case-control study on cancer risk among physicians and non-physicians at a health screening center. A total of 1,110 Korean subjects aged 30 to 65 years were assessed for cancer risk. A physician group (primary clinic, N = 147, tertiary hospital, N = 123) and non-physician group (N = 840) were included.

Results: In univariate analysis, age, gender, and being a primary clinic physician were factors significantly associated with cancer events. In multivariate analysis, being a primary clinic physician showed a statistically significant relationship with cancer incidence (control; age- and gender-adjusted relative risk [RR], 2.905; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.337-6.314; p = 0.007).

Conclusions: Primary clinic physicians are at higher risk of cancer than tertiary hospital physicians and non-physicians. Regular health examinations for primary clinic physicians may helpful to maintain their health status.


Cancer, Physician, Risk


Cancer is a leading cause of death in Korea [1] and has been a major Korean public health concern since 1983. The overall cancer incidence in Korea increased from 1975 to 1989, with non-significant changes during the period 1989 to 1998, and a significant decline in incidence from 1998 to 2008 [2,3].

The Korean workforce currently includes over 100,000 physicians. Physicians comprise a diverse group of healthcare personnel working under multiple occupational and environmental hazards and various teratogenic or carcinogenic factors contributing to impaired physical and mental health. These factors include physical, chemical, biological, and psychological hazards (chronic fatigue, depression, and burnout) and alcohol/tobacco exposure [4,5].

Some controversy has existed concerning the cancer incidence rate among physicians and non-physicians. Some studies reported increased mortality rates for specific tumor types in various health care professions: breast cancer among women physicians, and melanoma among men and women physicians, dentist may have an elevated risk for brain, skin and some reproductive cancers [4,6,7]. Other studies have reported a lower cancer death rate among physicians as compared to the general population [7,8]. In this study, we investigated cancer incidence rate in physicians comparing in non-physicians, using data from a single tertiary hospital records.


Study population

We performed a retrospective, cross-sectional study. The study population consisted of physicians and non-physicians who underwent screening health evaluation in a single tertiary hospital (Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) between January and December 2015. The study group consisted of a total of 1,110 asymptomatic subjects aged 30 to 65 years who participated in a screening health evaluation program and were at average risk of cancer. Subjects who underwent abdominal US, thyroid US, Esophagogastroduodenoscopy, colonoscopy, breast mammography, breast US, low-dose chest CT, transvaginal US, brain MRI on the same day for a comprehensive health evaluation in Seoul National University Bundang hospital healthcare center. All subjects filled out a questionnaire regarding family history of cancer, physical activity, alcohol drinking, smoking, and hormone use. We classified subjects into a control (non-physicians) and a physician group (primary care clinic vs. tertiary hospital). There were 3 controls per case, for a total of 840 evaluated.

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (#B-1603/338-105).

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) using a t-test. Categorical variables were determined by the chi-square test. Multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 22.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Two-sided P values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.


We reviewed 1,110 subjects comprised of 270 physicians and 840 non-physicians subjects; 667 (60.1%) were men and 443 (39.9%) were women. Table 1 shows the demographic data of the study subjects. In the entire study group, 11 primary clinic physicians (7.5%), 2 tertiary hospital physicians (1.6%), and 24 non-physicians (2.9%) were diagnosed with cancer. The mean ages (± SD) were 45.1 ± 9.2 years in the primary clinic physicians group, 37.1 ± 7.5 years in the tertiary hospital physicians group, and 45.6 ± 11.6 years in the non-physicians group. The mean ages (± SD) of those with cancer were 47.8 ± 9.9 years in the primary clinic physician group, 47.5 ± 6.4 years in the tertiary hospital physician group, and 47.5 ± 10.7 years in the non-physician group.

Table 1: Baseline characteristics of physicians vs. control group. View Table 1

As shown in table 2, a significant relationship was found between being a primary clinic physician and the risk of cancer in multivariate analysis (control; age- and gender-adjusted relative risk [RR], 2.905; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.337-6.314; p = 0.007).

Table 2: Multivariate-adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of cancer. View Table 2

Table 3 lists various types of cancer in the physicians group (primary and tertiary) and non-physicians group. Primay physician has 1 brain tumor, 1 thyroid cancer, 3 stomach cancer, 1 gallbladder cancer, 3 prostate cancer, 1 renal cell carcinoma. Tertiary physician has 1 rectal neuroendocrine tumor, 1 prostate cancer, 1 ovary cancer. Cancer numbers are too small to analyze for meaningful analysis.

Table 3: Cancer types among primary vs. tertiary physicians vs. non-physicians group. View Table 3


This retrospective analysis shows that primary clinic physicians have a significantly higher overall risk of cancer than tertiary hospital physicians and the reference non-physicians. This association remained significant even after adjusting for other risk factors, including age and gender. To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate an association between being a primary clinic physician and cancer risk.

Some epidemiological reports have suggested that physicians have either an average or low risk of cancer, e.g. in Israel and Taiwan [6,7,9]. One editorial offered several explanations for the lower cancer death rate among physicians as compared to the general population [10]. This may reflect the combined effects of relatively high socioeconomic status and knowledge of the consequences of health-related behaviors such as smoking, alcohol drinking, and drug abuse.

Our study results seemed to contradict previous reports that cancer risk is similar between tertiary hospital physicians and the non-physicians. Physicians have a higher prevalence of work-related stress and mental health problems than the general population [11-14]. A study in the USA suggested that motivational interventions may improve physician lifestyles and that positive personal health behaviors should be encouraged among physicians [15]. The study reported that over 53% had severe to moderate stress, 35% reported "no" or "occasional" exercise, 34% slept 6 or fewer hours daily, and 21% worked more than 60 hours per week. In Korea, the environment and health behavior of primary physicians is not optimal, even though physicians should know best how to live healthfully. Korean physicians in primary clinic, particularly those who routinely work on Saturday, when there are fewer severely ill patients, often perform minor surgery. Due to competition to provide low-cost healthcare services, the working hours of primary physicians are relatively long, with Saturday, Sunday, and weekday night hours. Thus, time for exercise is lacking, and there are few opportunities to schedule personal health evaluations. We suspect that enhanced and regular diagnostic evaluations account for the discrepancy in cancer risk between primary clinic and tertiary hospital physicians. Our hospital provides a physician-tailored free-of-charge annual health evaluation program to all physicians, and many have evaluations on a regular basis.

The KMA (Korean Medical Association) Health Policy Institute published a primary medical management survey [16,17] showing that the average weekly hours worked by primary physicians were 56.5, which is 5.5 hours longer than in 2005. Compared to non-physicians working 40 hours in a 5-day week, primary physicians usually work on average an additional 16.5 hours in a 6-day week. Working in the South Korean healthcare system [18], with universal coverage for all citizens and lower medical fees, threatens physician survival, as more physicians further divide an already decreased share of the market.

The strengths of the present study include the following: 1) physicians were evaluated by type of practice (primary clinic vs. tertiary hospital); 2) when cancer was diagnosed, treatment was started immediately, and continued follow-up was performed, suggesting the data were of high quality; and 3) all the physicians continue to provide medical services. A main limitation of this study is its cross-sectional, retrospective design. A second limitation is the small sample size.


In conclusion, our findings show a significant association between being a primary clinic physician and cancer risk. Regular health examinations for primary clinic physicians may helpful to maintain their health status.



We thank Seon Mie Kim, Ji-Hyun Seo, Eun-Ha Park, Hyun Jin Jo, and Nayoung Kim for their thoughtful comments on this manuscript. We thank the our physician-assistants for their participation in this study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author' contributions

HYK designed the study and drafted the manuscript. Author read and approved the final version of this manuscript.

  1. Korea S (2013) Cause of death statistics. Daejeon: Statistics Korea.

  2. Association KD (2012) Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Diabetes fact sheet in Korea.

  3. Jung K-W, Won Y-J, Kong H-J, Oh C-M, Lee DH, et al. (2014) Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2011. Cancer research and treatment: official journal of Korean Cancer Association 46: 109-123.

  4. Omenn GS, Morris SL (1984) Occupational hazards to health care workers: report of a conference. Am J Ind Med 6: 129-137.

  5. Wiskar K (2012) Physician health: A review of lifestyle behaviors and preventive health care among physicians. BCMJ 54: 419-423.

  6. Simning A, van Wijngaarden E (2007) Literature review of cancer mortality and incidence among dentists. Occup Environ Med 64: 432-438.

  7. Klein-Kremer A, Liphshitz I, Haklai Z, Linn S, Barchana M (2014) Cancer incidence among physicians in Israel. Isr Med Assoc J 16: 412-417.

  8. Carpenter LM, Swerdlow AJ, Fear NT (1997) Mortality of doctors in different specialties: findings from a cohort of 20000 NHS hospital consultants. Occup Environ Med 54: 388-395.

  9. Lin SY, Lin CL, Hsu WH, Wang IK, Chang CC, et al. (2013) A comparison of cancer incidence among physician specialists and the general population: a Taiwanese cohort study. J Occup Health 55: 158-166.

  10. Zamir D, Zamir M (2014) Cancer incidence: are physicians any different? Isr Med Assoc J 16: 446-448.

  11. Töyry S, Räsänen K, Kujala S, Aärimaa M, Juntunen J, et al. (2000) Self-reported health, illness, and self-care among finnish physicians: a national survey. Arch Fam Med 9: 1079-1085.

  12. Firth-Cozens J (2003) Doctors, their wellbeing, and their stress : It's time to be proactive about stress-and prevent it. BMJ: British Medical Journal 326: 670-671.

  13. Tyssen R (2007) Health problems and the use of health services among physicians: a review article with particular emphasis on Norwegian studies. Ind Health 45: 599-610.

  14. Chen P (2014) The Widespread problem of doctor burnout.

  15. Bazargan M, Makar M, Bazargan-Hejazi S, Ani C, Wolf KE (2009) Preventive, lifestyle, and personal health behaviors among physicians. Acad Psychiatry 33: 289-295.

  16. Yoon SJ (2012) The concept of primary care and current status of Korean healthcare system, Korean Medical Association 10: 12-17.

  17. Oh YH (2010) Primary Health Care: Current Status and Ways for Improvement. Health Welfare Policyforum: 16-32.

  18. Song YJ (2009) The South Korean health care system. JMAJ 52: 206-209.

International Journal of Anesthetics and Anesthesiology (ISSN: 2377-4630)
International Journal of Blood Research and Disorders   (ISSN: 2469-5696)
International Journal of Brain Disorders and Treatment (ISSN: 2469-5866)
International Journal of Cancer and Clinical Research (ISSN: 2378-3419)
International Journal of Clinical Cardiology (ISSN: 2469-5696)
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology and Treatment (ISSN: 2469-584X)
Clinical Medical Reviews and Case Reports (ISSN: 2378-3656)
Journal of Dermatology Research and Therapy (ISSN: 2469-5750)
International Journal of Diabetes and Clinical Research (ISSN: 2377-3634)
Journal of Family Medicine and Disease Prevention (ISSN: 2469-5793)
Journal of Genetics and Genome Research (ISSN: 2378-3648)
Journal of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology (ISSN: 2469-5858)
International Journal of Immunology and Immunotherapy (ISSN: 2378-3672)
International Journal of Medical Nano Research (ISSN: 2378-3664)
International Journal of Neurology and Neurotherapy (ISSN: 2378-3001)
International Archives of Nursing and Health Care (ISSN: 2469-5823)
International Journal of Ophthalmology and Clinical Research (ISSN: 2378-346X)
International Journal of Oral and Dental Health (ISSN: 2469-5734)
International Journal of Pathology and Clinical Research (ISSN: 2469-5807)
International Journal of Pediatric Research (ISSN: 2469-5769)
International Journal of Respiratory and Pulmonary Medicine (ISSN: 2378-3516)
Journal of Rheumatic Diseases and Treatment (ISSN: 2469-5726)
International Journal of Sports and Exercise Medicine (ISSN: 2469-5718)
International Journal of Stem Cell Research & Therapy (ISSN: 2469-570X)
International Journal of Surgery Research and Practice (ISSN: 2378-3397)
Trauma Cases and Reviews (ISSN: 2469-5777)
International Archives of Urology and Complications (ISSN: 2469-5742)
International Journal of Virology and AIDS (ISSN: 2469-567X)
More Journals

Contact Us

ClinMed International Library | Science Resource Online LLC
3511 Silverside Road, Suite 105, Wilmington, DE 19810, USA


Get Email alerts
Creative Commons License
Open Access
by ClinMed International Library is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License based on a work at
Copyright © 2017 ClinMed International Library. All Rights Reserved.