Join Us | Latest Articles | Contact

Journal Home

Editorial Board


Submit to this journal

Current issue

International Archives of Nursing and Health Care

DOI: 10.23937/2469-5823/1510020

An Integrative Review of Sickle Cell and Depression

Kimberly L Tartt*, Susan J Appel, Valerie Mann-Jiles, Kahlil Demonbreun and John Langlow III

Ohio State University in Columbus, Ohio, USA

*Corresponding author: Kimberly L. Tartt, DNP, APRN-BC, Certified Acute Care and Family Nurse Practitioner, The Ohio State University Wexner, Medical Center, 452 W. 10th Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA, Tel: (614)366-1275, (614-579-4539), Fax: (614) 366-5900, E-mail:,
Int Arch Nurs Health Care, IANHC-1-020, (Volume 1, Issue 1), Review Article; ISSN: 2469-5823
Received: October 17, 2015 | Accepted: December 12, 2015 | Published: December 16, 2015
Citation: Tartt KL, Appel SJ, Mann-Jiles V, Demonbreun K, John LIII (2015) An Integrative Review of Sickle Cell and Depression. Int Arch Nurs Health Care 1:020. 10.23937/2469-5823/1510020
Copyright: © 2015 Tartt KL, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


Purpose: Gain insight and knowledge through the exploration of depression among adult patients living with chronic illness such as sickle cell disease. The review focused on defining the prevalence of depression in chronic illness with emphasis on sickle cell. Associated chronic pain, quality of life, disease trajectory and the need for increased screening and treatment for depression in chronic illness such as with those living with sickle cell disease will be evaluated.

Data Sources: A search of the following databases: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Library, Ovid/Medline, PubMed and Google Scholar between (2003-2014).

Conclusions: There is a high prevalence of depression among patients living with SCD impacting their pain and quality of life. Additional research is needed to evaluate the use of antidepressants in SCD.

Implications for practice: Health care providers play an essential role in the assessment, and screening for depression. Effective management of these conditions may improve the quality of life of this adult population. Further investigation is warranted to understand the meaning of depression and psychosocial factors in this patient population. Findings from this integrative review may help to provide a clearer understanding of depression and psychosocial factors in adults with sickle cell disease and lead to future research to identify how depression treatment affects pain and quality of life.


Sickle cell, Depression, Quality of life, Pain, Disease trajectory


Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) refers to a group of genetic hematologic disorders characterized by the production of abnormal hemoglobin S instead of normal hemoglobin A. Common types of SCD are: anemia-SS, hemoglobin-SC and S-beta thalassemia. The anemia of SCD fosters increased susceptibility to infection, chronic and intermittent acute pain episodes, and multiple organ system dysfunctions [1]. Due to the distorted and rigid formation of sickled erythrocytes in microcirculation, there is tissue and organ ischemia [2]. Pain is considered the primary SCD symptom, occurring in both chronic and acute crisis [3].

A common hematologic disorder is SCD in the United States (US), affecting approximately 70,000-100,000, most of whom are African-Americans (AA) or Latino. The occurrence rate of SCD is 1 in 5 AAs and 1 in 36,000 Hispanic births [4]. Not limited to the US, SCD affects millions worldwide. Regions of high prevalence include: Africa, Caribbean, South America, Central America, Mediterranean countries (Turkey, Greece, and Italy), India and Saudi Arabia [4].

Impact of the trajectory sickle cell disease

Uncertainty and unpredictability of the SCD illness trajectory allows for a range of severity of illness. Uncertainty of when crises will occur coupled with pain and life threatening complications, contributes to a reduced quality of life (QOL) and psychological health among those affected. A study of 50 AAs found a higher prevalence of depression among those living with SCD than the general AA community [5]. Mild depression was present in 44% of the participants in comparison to the National Study of American Life which found a 10.4% prevalence of depression in AA [6]. Prevalence rates of depression in US from 2006-2008 among 17,604 AA ranged from 5.0-12.9% (CDC, 2010) [7]. Ward and Mengesha conducted a systematic review of 19 studies regarding AA men and depression and found a prevalence range of 5-10% [8].

The unpredictable trajectory of SCD leads to substantial situational depression. Little is however known about how interventions to treat depression may affect health outcomes for SCD. Prevalence of depression in SCD is comparable to that of other chronic illness and ranges from 18%-44% [3,5,9-13].

The NICE-91 guideline (2009) reported a two-three fold increase in depression among patients with a chronic illness (20-30%) compared to general population (10%) [14]. Rheumatoid Arthritis like SCD has acute and chronic pain episodes and uncertain trajectory with a similar rate of depression ranging from 14-38% [15]. Other common chronic illness such as diabetes mellitus has increased prevalence of co-morbid depression. Patients living with diabetes experience chronic neuropathic pain, multiple organ failure and uncertain trajectory similar to SCD. Ali, Stone, Peters, Davies and Khunti found the prevalence of depression in patients living with diabetes at 18% [16].

Studies of SCD to examine depression, evaluated pain and QOL are limited. Chronicity of illness, pain, stigma, discrimination and uncertainty in disease trajectory, overwhelming degree of complications, inadequate care, socioeconomic factors, educational level and social support are some of the complex factors that influence this complex relationship [1,3,12]. The exact cause of depression in SCD may not be entirely known; it may be a result of the underlying process, stigma or may actually be multifactorial [12]. The exact cause and effect relationship between depression and pain is not known, as to how much of the pain experienced in SCD is caused by depression versus whether more pain is causing the depression [3]. Despite the potential for adverse complications associated with comorbid depression, it is still under diagnosed and treated.

Purpose of this review was to analyze the research, gain insight and knowledge of depression in adult patients living with chronic illnesses such as SCD. Information gained by providers through increased understanding of SCD, may facilitate screening and early treatment of depression. Provider efficacy in addressing this life altering condition has a potential to improve health outcomes among those with SCD.


An integrative review of literature was conducted using Preferred Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) to increase rigor. Databases searches were conducted to identify studies that examined depression and psychosocial factors present among patients with SCD (e.g., CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Ovid/Medline, PubMed and Google Scholar). Search terms utilized were: sickle cell, depression, quality of life, trajectory and pain. The search was limited to studies published in English between 2003-2014 that examined the variables related to depression and psychosocial factors in adult with SCD. Results identified thirty-four articles using this criterion. Fourteen studies were selected for inclusion. Only research articles with adult participants aged 18 or greater diagnosed with SCD, were included. The studies contained variables related to depression and associated factors. Data evaluation to increase rigor and complexity was conducted. The fourteen articles included in this review are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1: Overview of Studies View Table 1


Depression and SCD

Living with the encumbrance of a chronic illness is potentially devastating as SCD may lead to depression [12]. Symptoms of depression and chronic illness are often similar and therefore healthcare providers fail to diagnose depression [3]. The prevalence of depression and its impact on pain and other variables is not limited.

The Pain in Sickle Cell Epidemiology Study (PiSCES) measured the presence of depression and anxiety among N = 232 participants with SCD and examined the relationship that exists with pain, QOL, healthcare utilization and opioid usage by having participants journal daily [9]. Baseline variables of depression, anxiety, and health-related QOL were assessed. Findings were that 27.6% were depressed and had pain more days than participants that were not depressed (p < 0.001). Depressed participants reported higher pain, more distress and interference from pain on non-crisis pain days. Additionally, depressed participants reported less physical and a poorer mental QOL [3]. These findings could represent the presence of chronic pain in SCD population which can be predicted by the presence of depression. Despite the absence of a crisis they were having pain almost daily representing chronic pain due to presence of depression.

Hasan et al. studied N = 50 adults with SCD to assess the prevalence of depressive symptoms and determine impact of disease severity and health care usage among participants without a vaso-occlusive crisis for at least one month [5]. These researchers found 44% scored within the mild-severe range for depression and 26% were severely depressed [5]. It was found that depressed patients were more likely to access healthcare services through frequent ED visits (p = 0.03) and were subsequently hospitalized for pain crisis (> 5 in 1 year; p = 0.0003). The study found gender to be a predictor of depressive symptoms in females (p = 0.03), those with > 20 units of blood transfusions (p = 0.03), > 5 hospitalizations or ED visits within the previous year (p = 0.03), less than a high school education (p = 0.04), > 5 crises in the previous year (p = 0.00003), inadequate social support (p = 0.02), family income < 10,000/year (p = 0.001) and use of Hydroxyurea (p = 0.03) as a proxy of SCD severity. These results highlight the impact of certain demographic variables and severity of disease as contributors to depression. Availability of social support, education level and socioeconomic status were found to especially impact females. The need for providers to monitor number of transfusions, hospitalization utilization and use of Hydroxurea as predictors of disease severity and a risk of depression may be important. This study confirmed AA with SCD had a higher prevalence of depression than healthy counterparts.

Asnani, et al. assessed the prevalence of and variables associated with depression and loneliness among N = 277 Jamaican adults with SCD compared to an N = 65 AA control group [11]. The prevalence of depression was 21.6%. A two-fold increase was found in comparison to control group at 9.4% [11]. These researchers used a higher cutoff score of 17 for diagnosis of depressive symptoms to increase specificity due to the high somatic symptom burden (fatigue, and loss of energy) associated with SCD.

The PiSCES Project, examined somatic symptom burden (SSB) among adults with SCD (N = 230) who answered SSB questionnaires, to exclude 4 common pain sites of SCD: limb, back, stomach and chest [10]. High SSB was found in 18.3% and occurred more often among women than men (p = 0.0033). Analysis found 27.8% were depressed; of those depressed 37.5% had coexisting high SSB (p ≤ 0.0001). Sogutlu et al. found the high SSB was an indication of more days of chronic pain requiring increase usage of healthcare and corresponded with depression, anxiety and decreased health-related QOL [10]. This study demonstrated the prevalence of somatic symptoms may not be related to the disease process or severity, but are more a comorbidity with depression. There were also more days of chronic pain due to somatization and psychological factors in comparison to crisis pain. Pain associated with a SC crisis was not different between those with high or low SSB. Recognition of these symptoms may be beneficial to health outcomes. Knowledge of the high prevalence of other somatic symptoms besides pain of SCD may influence care of this population and improve QOL.

Depression/depressive symptoms were evaluated among N = 232 AAs with SCD. Participants 26.3% self-reported being depressed. However, 32% had a score which was diagnostic for depression. The most common depressive symptom reported as experienced was lack of pleasure and enjoyment; the least common reported was suicidal ideations [12]. Researchers also reported a correlation (p = 0.02) between reported depressive symptoms and frequency of crises. This study demonstrated the high prevalence of depression in SCD and the importance of providers screening and assessing for depressive symptoms.

Edwards et al. explored depression, suicidal ideation and/or attempts in N = 67 AAs diagnosed with SCD. The investigators found that AA's depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation may be challenging to recognize and diagnose due to how their symptoms present [17]. As depressive symptoms that are common in the general population such as: apathy, hopelessness and crying spells were lower in this study however, fatigue and appetite disturbances yielded an overestimation of depression prevalence. Among AA populations, depression carries a stigma and self-measures and perseverance is used to manage it versus seeking treatment [13].

Edwards et al. found 22% of participants depression scores were in the mild or greater range [18]. Self-reporting of depression in the past 30 days occurred in 36% of the participants. Suicide Ideation was assessed and it was found 29% of the participants reported an episode of suicidal ideation, (p < 0.0007) and 8% reported an attempt. Those participants that reported suicidal ideation (p = 0.02) and/or previous suicide attempts (p = 0.001) reported higher levels of depression. The researchers did not find that pain ratings to be impacted by suicidal ideation or attempts (Edwards et al, 2009). These results demonstrate the unique presentation and variation in depressive symptoms among SCD.

SCD and Pain

Pain is a hallmark symptom of SCD and a primary reason for morbidity in SCD [18,19]. Pain can be very debilitating and devastating to those living with SCD. Pain can be acute episodic referred to as "crises" and/or chronic in nature. Acute pain is secondary to ischemia caused by vaso-occlusion from the malformed red blood cells [3]. Little is known about chronic pain in SCD. Taylor et al. found chronic pain was a result of the multiple complications of SCD [19]. Pain and depression in SCD is a complex dynamic relationship; studies discussed previously in this review are applicable to defining pain in SCD [20].

A sub-study of the PiSCES Project examined relationships among self-reported SCD pain. Pain diaries were completed by N = 232 participants defining characteristics of their pain, crisis experienced or not, medication utilized or healthcare utilization [20]. It was found 54% reported pain on greater than half of the days. Pain was reported almost every day in 29% participants. As the percentage of pain days increased so did the intensity of mean pain score (p < 0.001). Pain intensity was significantly higher on healthcare utilization days (p < 0.001) however, it was not a predictor of crisis. Despite experiencing crisis pain on 12.7% of the days, utilization of healthcare only occurred on 3.5% of the days. This study demonstrated the prevalence and severity of pain in SCD is greater than previously thought and is an expected finding not an exception. Pain was experienced on more days than not, demonstrating chronicity of pain. These results indicate that pain is occurring almost daily, is moderate to severe intensity however, healthcare service was not readily utilized for management of pain at home. Providers may underestimate the prevalence of SCD associated pain resulting in under treatment which can foster untreated depression [20].

Wellington et al. conducted an evaluation of the 1st of 5 years of data that examined the relationships among: somatization, psychopathology and pain among N = 156 adults with SCD [21]. Somatization as defined in the study is the obsessive focus on health or symptoms regardless of cause that often results in neglect of other life priorities. A multidimensional tool was administered that covered pain and eight other validated instruments measuring psychiatric, behavioral and social function. The results found somatization (p < 0.0001) predicted pain intensity, severity and length of average pain over time [21]. Somatization was found to be a significant (p < 0.001) prediction of depression. Demonstrating that people living with SCD have a tendency to focus excessively on their health or small changes in their health status and somatization may result in experiencing more pain. The providers' early assessment and identification of somatization may result in more effective and efficient interventions geared to improving their psychological function and pain management.

Sogutlu et al. examined the relationship between SSB and found pain is also applicable to depression, among N = 230 participants who answered SSB, health care QOL questionnaires and kept pain diaries [10]. Excessive SSB had significantly higher percentage of days of non-crisis pain (chronic pain), and healthcare utilization for pain but no difference was found regarding crisis associated pain [10]. This study's findings are consistent with others [3,12,22] that examined the depression and pain in SCD and may facilitate understanding of pain in SCD and the complex relationship with depression.


Imhonde, Ndom and Edon examined how social support, self-esteem, gender and depression would impact QOL with SCD [22]. A total of N = 52 participants from an SCD center answered a questionnaire with five sections consisting of: demographic variables, QOL scale, depression, social support scale and self-esteem scale. The study measured mental health as depression and self-esteem and social health as closeness with family and friends [21]. Findings revealed QOL was impacted (p < 0.001) by self-esteem, depression and social support. Social support was found to have an impact (p < 0.05) on QOL, and depression (p < 0.05) inversely impacted QOL among SCD [22]. These findings may facilitate providers understanding of QOL in SCD, and the need to allow for interventions to enhance social support, and treatment for depression. Imhonde et al., research on QOL, suggested that there are four types of social support (affection, emotional/informational, positive social interaction and tangible) that positively impacts QOL [22]. Encouraging social contacts through close relationships with family and friends, participating in social activities and forming friendships through social networks may improve social support, depression and QOL.

Dampier et al, examined the relationship between multiple disease complications of SCD and reported QOL. Adults N = 1046 from SCD Centers answered questions regarding their health history and a questionnaire that measured QOL [23]. The researchers found reporting poor health status was associated with increasing age, opioid usage, history of vaso-occlusive pain (p < 0.01) and asthma (p < 0.05). Three complications: vaso-occlusive crisis, asthma and avascular necrosis were the complications that lowered the score. Use of chronic antidepressants (p < 0.05) decreased scores on bodily pain. Chronic opioids use resulted in diminished scores on all scales. Frequent use of opioids or chronic antidepressants (p < 0.01) lowered mental health scores [23]. The patient's perspective of their QOL is impaired by acute and chronic pain more than any of the other disease related complications [23]. In general, SCD is associated with a substantial decrease in QOL. Effective pain management and treatment of depression by providers is needed to improve overall QOL in patients living with SCD.

Mann-Jiles and Morris conducted a study in an outpatient hematology-oncology clinic with N = 62 adults with SCD [24]. A self-reported scale was used, scores could range from 16-112 with higher scores equating to a higher QOL. The mean QOL scores were significantly lower (83.6) in comparison to general healthy population (90). Results of other chronic disease QOLS scores were reported ranged from 61-87; scores were 52-112 in this study. Spirituality was the only variable that was significant (p < 0.05) when examining QOL [24]. This study suggests QOL among those living with SCD is impaired; providers should incorporate an assessment of variables that impact patients' QOL to facilitate improved physical and psychological health.

Gibson et al. explored the relationship of locus of control (LOC), depression and QOL in N = 143 Jamaican adults with SCD [25]. The LOC orientation is either external or internal; if ones' perception that life experiences are determined by external factors outside their control this is external. Life experiences which are determined by ones' behavior is defined as internal LOC [26]. The participants answered questions on three scales measuring LOC, depression and QOL. Three subscales; "doctors", "other people", "chance" and "internal"; the first three are measures of external LOC and the last is internal LOC. Depression was present in 13% of the participants. The study revealed (p < 0.01) higher scores in the external LOC domains of "chance" compared to other chronic illness (rheumatoid arthritis, chronic pain and diabetes). External LOC domain "other people" was significant (p < 0.01) compared to rheumatoid arthritis, pain, diabetes and cancer. Internal LOC had significantly (p < 0.01) higher scores than all other compared chronic illness except diabetes. A significant association between external LOC and QOL, however internal LOC was associated (p < 0.05) with higher QOL and decreased depressive symptoms. External LOC "other people" was significant (p < 0.05) of depressive symptoms [25]. Improving internal LOC and minimizing "other people" LOC may improve QOL and decrease risk of depression. Empowering the patient with choices in clinical decision making provides a sense of autonomy and improves QOL. Assisting patient with finding a balance between over reliance mentally and physically on family and friends and maintaining appropriate levels of contact and support with family, friends and social will be beneficial in decreasing risk of depression.

SCD and disease trajectory

Uncertainty and unpredictability in disease course can hinder those living with SCD and lead to fear, psychosocial and emotional distress. This population is at risk for early death due to acute complications: stroke, osteonecrosis of femoral head, pain episodes, acute chest, multiple organ failure and increased risk of infection and pulmonary hypertension [22,16]. The uncertainty of knowing when or how their death is going to happen and the unpredictability of disease course contributes to a decrease QOL and depression.

Platt et al., conducted a study of deaths and clinical course among N = 3764 patients in the Cooperative Study of SCD (CSSCD). The cause of deaths of n = 209 adults who died during the study was evaluated and risk factors for early death was evaluated in n = 964 adults followed for a minimum of 2 years [27]. The researchers found nearly 1/3 of the participants that died did not have clinical evidence of organ failure; death occurred during an acute crisis (pain, acute chest or stroke). Risk for early mortality was the presence of symptomatic disease [27].

Morbidity and mortality are high with SCD, however it has been reduced over the decades due in part to the advances in medical therapy, improved psychosocial support, management of infections and complications and health maintenance [28]. It is estimated that starting in late adolescents 40% of people with SCD will be affected by pulmonary hypertension of which there is a50% mortality within 2 years [2]. The prognosis was estimated by the type and severity of SCD with median age of survival of 42 years of age for males and 48 years of age in female in SCD SS and 60 years and 68 years in SCD-SC [18,28]. Prognosis has improved as patients are now living longer into the 7th and 8th decade [28]. Advances in medical technology and treatments have changed SCD into a chronic illness of childhood extending into adulthood. The improved life expectancy provides opportunity for providers to improve QOL through health maintenance, recognition and treatment of depression and effective chronic and acute pain management, patient and family education. The practitioner's role is key to meeting the challenges of this endeavor.


Fourteen articles met inclusion criteria for this integrative review. The review discussed depression, pain, QOL and disease trajectory and impact depression among those living with SCD. A high prevalence of depression was confirmed among SCD ranging from 18-44% [3,5,10-12]. Depression in SCD is more prevalent than in the general AA population, however it is consistent with that of other chronic illness of prevalence of 20-30% [5,11]. Demographic variables such as: education, gender, social support and unemployment are predictive of depression [5,11]. Interventions should be carried out to ensure adequate social support and close and healthy relationship with friends and families to minimize risk for depression. Depression is (p = 0.02) associated with frequency of crisis, increased healthcare utilization services and hospitalizations for pain crisis and presence of chronic/near daily pain [3,5,12]. Depressive symptoms may be a challenge to recognize in SCD populations as they present with different symptoms than the general population. Edwards et al., found a significant association between depression and suicidal ideations (p = 0.04), suicide attempts (p = 0.001) however, in contrast suicidal ideation was the least common reported symptom in the study conducted by Jenerette et al., [17].

Rates of pain may actually be higher than findings of study as patients were staying home and not seeking healthcare even though they had near daily pain. Despite the PiSCES Project predicting the relationships between depression and pain variables it is still unknown if having more pain caused depression or if more pain was a result of the presence of depression [3]. Since depression caused significantly more pain on days when a crisis was not occurring then providers should develop interventions for pain and depression management applicable to outpatient setting and not entirely focused on inpatient setting. Depression results in poorer QOL. There is not much known about QOL in SCD. This can be accomplished by empowering SCD patients to be actively involved in treatment plan and provide choices or options when applicable.

The consistent limitation of all the studies was the self-report nature of the instruments used to measure depression and other variables. Use of self- report relies on the participant to answer accurately and truthfully. A few of the studies had small sample sizes or used convenience sampling. The tools to measure depression were validated for use in primary care, however the use specifically in vulnerable populations with chronic illness like SCD was not established.

Implications for Practice

Providers play an essential role in the assessment, and screening of depression. Effective management of these conditions may improve QOL. Further investigation is warranted to understand the meaning of depression and psychosocial factors in this patient population. Findings from this review may help to provide a clearer understanding of depression and psychosocial factors in adults with SCD and lead to future research to identify how depression treatment affects pain and quality of life. Providers' first step is the acknowledgement and acceptance that depression is a substantial problem that must be addressed. Early depression screening, identification and treatment of depression are important to improve QOL. Educating patients about depression and its impact on their life and pain management may remove the stigma associated and assist in early treatment of depression.


There is a high prevalence of depression in SCD impacting their pain and quality of life. Additional research is needed in evaluating the use of antidepressants in SCD to determine if QOL and pain is improved. Antidepressants that also treat pain may be most efficacious among those living with SCD. Practitioners are in the best position to treat depression through providing holistic care but not just treating the disease.

  1. Edwards CL, Scales MT, Loughlin C, Bennett GG, Harris-Peterson S, et al. (2005) A brief review of the pathophysiology, associated pain, and psychosocial issues in sickle cell disease. Int J Behav Med 12: 171-179.

  2. Buchanan G, Vichinsky E, Krishnamurti L, Shenoy S (2010) Severe sickle cell disease-pathophysiology and therapy. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation 16: S64-S67.

  3. Levenson JL, McClish DK, Dahman BA, Bovbjerg VE, de A Citero V, et al. (2008) Depression and anxiety in adults with sickle cell disease: the PiSCES project. Psychosom Med 70: 192-196.

  4. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (2012) Disease and conditions index: Who is at risk for sickle cell anemia?.

  5. Hasan SP, Hashmi S, Alhassen M, Lawson W, Castro O (2003) Depression in sickle cell disease. J Natl Med Assoc 95: 533-537.

  6. Williams DR, Gonzalez HM, Neighbors H, Nesse R, Abelson JM, et al. (2007) Prevalence and distribution of major depressive disorder in African Americans, Caribbean blacks, and non-Hispanic whites: results from the National Survey of American Life. Arch Gen Psychiatry 64: 305-315.

  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2010) Current depression among adults 2006-2008. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.

  8. Ward E, Mengesha M (2013) Depression in African American men: a review of what we know and where we need to go from here. Am J Orthopsychiatry 83: 386-397.

  9. Levenson J (2008) Updates in psychosomatic medicine and consultation-liaison psychiatry. psychiatric issues in adults with sickle cell disease. Primary Psychiatry 15: 45-49.

  10. Sogutlu A, Levenson JL, McClish DK, Rosef SD, Smith WR (2011) Somatic symptom burden in adults with sickle cell disease predicts pain, depression, anxiety, health care utilization, and quality of life: the PiSCES project. Psychosomatics 52: 272-279.

  11. Asnani MR, Fraser R, Lewis NA, Reid ME (2010) Depression and loneliness in Jamaicans with sickle cell disease. BMC Psychiatry 10: 40.

  12. Jenerette C, Funk M, Murdaugh C (2005) Sickle cell disease: a stigmatizing condition that may lead to depression. Issues Ment Health Nurs 26: 1081-1101.

  13. Laurence B, George D, Woods D (2006) Association between elevated depressive symptoms and clinical disease severity in African-American adults with sickle cell disease. Journal of the National Medical Association 98: 365-369.

  14. National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health (2009) Depression in adults with a chronic physical health problem: Treatment and management (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence No 91). London, UK.

  15. Matcham F, Rayner L, Steer S, Hotopf M (2013) The prevalence of depression in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 52: 2136-2148.

  16. Ali S, Stone MA, Peters JL, Davies MJ, Khunti K (2006) The prevalence of co-morbid depression in adults with Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabet Med 23: 1165-1173.

  17. Edwards CL, Green M, Wellington CC, Muhammad M, Wood M, et al. (2009) Depression, suicidal ideation, and attempts in black patients with sickle cell disease. J Natl Med Assoc 101: 1090-1095.

  18. Platt OS, Thorington BD, Brambilla DJ, Milner PF, Rosse WF, et al. (1991) Pain in sickle cell disease. Rates and risk factors. N Engl J Med 325: 11-16.

  19. Taylor LE, Stotts NA, Humphreys J, Treadwell MJ, Miaskowski C (2010) A review of the literature on the multiple dimensions of chronic pain in adults with sickle cell disease. J Pain Symptom Manage 40: 416-435.

  20. Smith WR, Penberthy LT, Bovbjerg VE, McClish DK, Roberts JD, et al. (2008) Daily assessment of pain in adults with sickle cell disease. Ann Intern Med 148: 94-101.

  21. Wellington C, Edwards CL, McNeil J, Wood M, Crisp B, et al. (2010) Somatization in the conceptualization of sickle cell disease. J Natl Med Assoc 102: 1079-1083.

  22. Imhonde HO, Ndom RJE, Ehon A (2013) Social-support, self-esteem and depression as determinants of quality of life among sickle cell patients. Ife Psychologia 21: 101-113.

  23. Dampier C, Lieff S, LeBeau P, Rhee S, McMurray M, et al. (2010) Health-related quality of life in children with sickle cell disease: A report from the comprehensive sickle cell centers clinical trial consortium. Pediatric Blood & Cancer 55: 485-494.

  24. Mann-Jiles V, Morris DL (2009) Quality of life of adult patients with sickle cell disease. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 21: 340-349.

  25. Gibson RC, Morgan KA, Abel WD, Sewell CA, Martin JS, et al. (2013) Locus of control, depression and quality of life among persons with sickle cell disease in Jamaica. Psychol Health Med 18: 451-460.

  26. Tanyi RA (2003) Sickle cell disease: health promotion and maintenance and the role of primary care nurse practitioners. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 15: 389-397.

  27. Platt OS, Brambilla DJ, Rosse WF, Milner PF, Castro O, et al. (1994) Mortality in sickle cell disease. Life expectancy and risk factors for early death. N Engl J Med 330: 1639-1644.

  28. National Institutes of Health National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (2002) The management of sickle cell disease 4th ed (NIH publication No 02-2117). Bethesda, MD.

International Journal of Anesthetics and Anesthesiology (ISSN: 2377-4630)
International Journal of Blood Research and Disorders   (ISSN: 2469-5696)
International Journal of Brain Disorders and Treatment (ISSN: 2469-5866)
International Journal of Cancer and Clinical Research (ISSN: 2378-3419)
International Journal of Clinical Cardiology (ISSN: 2469-5696)
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology and Treatment (ISSN: 2469-584X)
Clinical Medical Reviews and Case Reports (ISSN: 2378-3656)
Journal of Dermatology Research and Therapy (ISSN: 2469-5750)
International Journal of Diabetes and Clinical Research (ISSN: 2377-3634)
Journal of Family Medicine and Disease Prevention (ISSN: 2469-5793)
Journal of Genetics and Genome Research (ISSN: 2378-3648)
Journal of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology (ISSN: 2469-5858)
International Journal of Immunology and Immunotherapy (ISSN: 2378-3672)
International Journal of Medical Nano Research (ISSN: 2378-3664)
International Journal of Neurology and Neurotherapy (ISSN: 2378-3001)
International Archives of Nursing and Health Care (ISSN: 2469-5823)
International Journal of Ophthalmology and Clinical Research (ISSN: 2378-346X)
International Journal of Oral and Dental Health (ISSN: 2469-5734)
International Journal of Pathology and Clinical Research (ISSN: 2469-5807)
International Journal of Pediatric Research (ISSN: 2469-5769)
International Journal of Respiratory and Pulmonary Medicine (ISSN: 2378-3516)
Journal of Rheumatic Diseases and Treatment (ISSN: 2469-5726)
International Journal of Sports and Exercise Medicine (ISSN: 2469-5718)
International Journal of Stem Cell Research & Therapy (ISSN: 2469-570X)
International Journal of Surgery Research and Practice (ISSN: 2378-3397)
Trauma Cases and Reviews (ISSN: 2469-5777)
International Archives of Urology and Complications (ISSN: 2469-5742)
International Journal of Virology and AIDS (ISSN: 2469-567X)
More Journals

Contact Us

ClinMed International Library | Science Resource Online LLC
3511 Silverside Road, Suite 105, Wilmington, DE 19810, USA


Get Email alerts
Creative Commons License
Open Access
by ClinMed International Library is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License based on a work at
Copyright © 2017 ClinMed International Library. All Rights Reserved.