Citation

Cavallini MF, Dyck DJ (2020) Exercise is Medicine! Why are People not Buying into the Prescription?. J Fam Med Dis Prev 6:125. doi.org/10.23937/2469-5793/1510125

Research Article | OPEN ACCESS DOI: 10.23937/2469-5793/1510125

Exercise is Medicine! Why are People not Buying into the Prescription?

M Felicia Cavallini1 and David J Dyck2

1Professor of Physical Education, Limestone University, USA

2Professor of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Canada

Abstract

Purpose and methods

Despite decades of research documenting the numerous health benefits of exercise, most people are not buying into the "Exercise is Medicine" prescription and making the commitment to exercise regularly. The purpose of this study was to examine: 1) Participants' perceptual association with descriptive statements and certain activities relating to exercise and physical activity (PA); 2) Participant's attitudes towards the gym environment; and 3) The overall relationship between participants' associations with PA and exercise, and their preferences for how they want to be physically active. Adults ages 18 years and older representing diverse groups from rural and urban communities in Guelph and Wellington County in Southwestern Ontario, Canada and groups from Cherokee County, South Carolina were participated in this mixed methodology study. Focus group facilitated discussions were conducted with 234 people from Southwestern Ontario and 175 people from South Carolina. Using the themes that emerged from the focus group interviews, a research-generated survey was created to validate the findings of the initial focus group interviews.

Results

Overall, regardless of geographical region, most people felt that there was a difference between PA and exercise, and that national guidelines for activity could be met through lifestyle PA. Most respondents also felt that lifestyle PA was preferable to traditional exercise and easier to incorporate into their daily activity, particularly when goal oriented. Generally, participants associated exercise with being structured or planned. However, several inconsistencies were also evident. Adults from South Carolina indicated a greater association of exercise with being painful and boring, impractical, difficult to begin, and a chore. However, most South Carolinians, as well as Southern Ontarians, also indicated exercise as being a stress reliever, and that they felt happy and a sense of accomplishment afterwards. Not surprisingly, such activities included walking, playing with children, and other activities commonly done around the house (gardening, cleaning, carrying groceries, walking the dog) were associated with lifestyle PA. Generally, with only a few exceptions, about half the participants indicated that they had gym memberships. Interestingly, South Carolinians were more inclined to believe that going to gym was necessary to take care of themselves. Ironically, participants from South Carolina also were more likely to find getting started to be a problem, but also found typical gym exercises to be more enjoyable than those from South Ontario. Perhaps most surprising to us was that, regardless of geographic location, participants did not indicate strong feelings towards being embarrassed, intimidated, or feeling judged at the gym, or having any perception of a negative environment. However, most participants still indicated a preference towards activities which could be done outside of the gym environment.

Conclusion

Most participants, despite recognizing the health benefits of traditional exercise, prefer to incorporate physical activity into everyday activities. "Exercise is Medicine", but if the majority of adults will not partake in traditional activities, the medical community must consider what is most meaningful for their patients and the public at large instead of preaching a "one size fits all" narrative.

Introduction

Exercise is Medicine (EIM), an American-based global health initiative, has substantiated the importance of exercise as a means of treating and preventing chronic diseases, and improving quality of life. EIM primarily targets the medical and health care community, who seek to inform patients and the public at large about the importance of engaging in exercise [1]. Most Americans and Canadians do not meet national Physical Activity (PA) guidelines of 150 minutes of Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA) plus 2 or more strengthening activities per week [2-5]. Despite years of emphasizing the multiple benefits of exercise through research, images of the gym and muscular, lean fit individuals, most people still are not making the commitment to exercise regularly and taking their "Exercise is Medicine" prescription. With the rise of obesity, sedentary living, and the most recent COVID-19 virus pandemic which has prompted a health reality check, it has become more vital than ever to evaluate the needs of the public to promote PA in a more compelling way.

More recent studies have indicated a preference for lifestyle PA rather than traditional exercise, including activities such as walking, mowing the grass, riding a bike, active transporting to and from work, and fulfilling everyday tasks and chores around the home [6-8]. Many people have expressed that lifestyle PA is a more natural, doable and enjoyable way to achieve the national PA guidelines [9].

Educating the public on the importance of a more customized, person-centered approach to PA can give people confidence to want to move more, and in a way that makes substantial sense to them. Motivating people to embrace PA should not be a "one size fits all" approach. The prospective PA participant needs to understand their personal inclinations to what they like or do not like and act on these.

Objectives

Adults from Southern Ontario and South Carolina were included in this study. The purpose of this study was: 1) To examine participants' perceptual association with descriptive statements and certain activities relating to exercise and PA; 2) To examine participant's attitudes towards the gym environment; and 3) To examine the overall relationship between participants' associations with PA and exercise, and their preferences for how they want to be physically active.

Methods

Participants

Studies in Guelph Wellington County in Ontario, Canada and Gaffney and Cherokee County in South Carolina received Research Ethics Board (University of Guelph) and Institutional Review Board (Limestone College) clearance respectively. Males and females ages 18 years and older representing 13 diverse groups from rural and urban communities in Guelph and Wellington County in Southwestern Ontario, Canada and 13 groups from Cherokee County, South Carolina participated in this study. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Some examples from Guelph Wellington County included members of the following groups: A rural Parks and Recreation Department, Lion's Club from a rural community, a rural Mennonite church, a women's advocacy group called Zonta International of Guelph, the staff from the Guelph YMCA/YWCA, and the Italian Canadian Club of Guelph. Focus groups from Cherokee County in South Carolina included members from a United Methodist and Baptist church, the Board of Public Works, the City of Gaffney staff, Rotary Clubs, City of Gaffney firefighters and schoolteachers from a rural elementary school. The exclusion criteria were any health conditions that precluded a participant from exercising.

Procedures

Phase I: Phase I of the research study concentrated on the phenomenological, qualitative approach to gathering data through facilitated focus group discussions and took place in Guelph Wellington County (234 people) from December of 2014 to May of 2015, and in Cherokee County (175 people) from December of 2016 to May of 2018. Focus groups included 6-15 participants and were held in a preferred meeting place to facilitate a relaxed discussion. Conversations were not recorded, and each participant was reassured that the discussions would be kept confidential. Participants were urged to share their associations and perceptions of exercise versus PA, as well as their perceptions of the gym environment.

Participants complete a short demographic questionnaire regarding their gender, age, and residence. The focus group discussions lasted 45 to 60 minutes. Participants were free to leave at any time. The same, trained investigator facilitated each group discussion. Guiding questions included: What do you think of when you hear the word exercise? What comes to your mind when you hear the words physical activity? How do you compare your perception of exercise to PA? Is PA more realistic, enjoyable and doable to accomplish as a part of your day? What is your perception of the gym environment? Do you feel judged while working out in the gym? Do you think the recommended PA guidelines of 150 minutes of MVPA can be met in lifestyle PA? Are you intimidated when using the equipment in the gym? Further probing questions followed and were dependent upon the participants' initial responses. Focus group discussions were observed by 1 or 2 university students who made notes of the conversation as well as an interpretation of what they heard. The group facilitator thoroughly examined all of the focus group notes gathered from the student note takers as well as their own notes to identify recurring themes, which could ultimately be incorporated into the survey questionnaire (Phase II). From the feedback given in phase I, it became clear that many participants were cognizant of the benefits of exercise, but from a practical standpoint, lifestyle PA was preferred.

Phase II: A survey was created to validate the findings of the initial focus group interviews. Common themes and trends that emerged regarding PA, exercise and the gym environment from the interviews were identified by three experts with backgrounds in physical education and exercise. These themes were used to construct a series of descriptive statements related to peoples' preferences for PA, and views of exercise, PA and the gym environment. Survey administration was scheduled at a convenient time and location suitable for each group with the objective of obtaining as many participants as possible. Participation in the focus group discussions was not required for completion of the survey. Survey questions are indicated in Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3.

Table 1: Attitudes and opinions towards physical activity and exercise.
For each of the following statements, please choose either yes or no for your response. View Table 1

Table 2: Descriptors of physical exercise vs. exercise. Identify whether you associate each descriptor with Physical Activity (PA) or Exercise (E). View Table 2

Table 3: Gym membership and perceptions. View Table 3

Results

The responses to various attitudes and opinions towards PA and exercise are shown in Table 4 and Table 5. Overall, most people felt that there was a difference between PA and exercise, and that national guidelines for activity could be met through lifestyle PA. Most respondents also felt that lifestyle PA was preferable to traditional exercise and easier to incorporate into their daily routine, particularly when goal oriented.

Table 4: Ranking of statements describing gym culture. Please circle the number that represents how you feel about the gym environment and gym members. View Table 4

Table 5: Attitudes and opinions towards physical activity and exercise. The percentage of respondents who answered "Yes". View Table 5

Common associations with exercise, rather than lifestyle PA, are indicated in Table 6. Generally, participants associated exercise with being structured or planned. However, several inconsistencies were evident. Adults from South Carolina indicated a greater association of exercise with being painful and boring, impractical, difficult to begin, and a chore. However, most South Carolinians, as well as Southern Ontarians, also indicated exercise as being a stress reliever, and that they felt happy and a sense of accomplishment afterwards.

Table 6: Male and female responses to survey questions related to the association of descriptive statements with exercise rather than physical activity. Numbers represent the percentage of total respondents a descriptor with exercise. View Table 6

Activities commonly associated as being part of lifestyle PA, rather than traditional exercise, are shown in Table 7.

Table 7: Male and female responses to survey questions related to the association of certain activities with physical activity rather than exercise. Numbers represent the percentage of total respondents associating a word or phrase with physical activity. View Table 7

Table 8 and Table 9 show participants' associations with the traditional gym culture. About half the participants indicated that they had gym memberships. Interestingly, South Carolinians were more inclined to believe that going to gym was necessary to take care of themselves; ironically, South Carolinians were more likely to find getting started to be a problem, but also found typical gym exercises to be more enjoyable than those from South Ontario. Regardless of geographic location, participants did not indicate strong feelings towards being embarrassed, intimidated or feeling judged at the gym, or having any perception of a negative environment. However, most participants still indicated a preference towards activities which could be done outside of the gym environment.

Table 8: Male and female responses to survey questions related to gym participation. Numbers represent the percentage of respondents answering "Yes" to the question. View Table 8

Table 9: Ranking of statements associated with gym culture (1, strongly disagree; 5, strongly agree). View Table 9

Discussion

Overall, participants viewed exercise as "planned, structured, regimented and repetitive", which likely accounts for the fact that most participants preferred lifestyle PA over traditional exercise. Yet, one of the more interesting results reflected that the majority of Southern Ontarians who did belong to a gym, did not think going to the gym was a necessary part of life to take care of themselves. The majority of South Carolinians indicated the contrary. This could be due to the influence of a highly organized sport culture that exists in the US which can form a mindset that an exercise workout is ultimately the way to engage in PA. The general public needs to be convinced that lifestyle PA truly is a viable way to keep physically active, and that people should not feel compelled to move in a formal, structured environment if not attracted to this type of PA.

Previous research has shown that those who do favor exercise tend to have a higher level of self-efficacy, outcome expectation, and place an important priority on exercise [10,11]. However, since lifestyle PA can be incorporated throughout the day, it is possible that anxiety and stress levels are lowered. It could also be that the perception of traditional exercise hinders people from feeling like they can accomplish PA without having to go to the gym. By the time many people return home after a long day of work, they are too tired to think about a formal workout and change into gym clothes and then dash off to the gym. In addition, women found that other matters are more important and require their time and energy [12].

There were some distinct differences between the descriptive associations of exercise from the South Carolina participants and those from Southern Ontario. The responses from adults across all ages from South Carolina revealed that they associated exercise with "painful, tiring and boring" as well as "impractical, takes too long to drive to the gym, exercise and shower" while these descriptors were not as significant with Southern Ontarians. In addition, other than the females in the 18 to 34-year-old group (53%), South Carolinians also indicated it was hard to get motivated to participate in exercise while the majority of the respondents from Southern Ontario did not find it difficult to overcome inertia to achieve PA. Overall, both Southern Ontario and South Carolinians associated exercise as being a stress reliever. Notably among the females in both regions, a feeling of happiness and a sense of accomplishment after engaging in exercise was expressed. Some of the results indicate most adults do understand physiological and affective benefits to exercise but for all practical purposes, still prefer lifestyle PA.

There is definitely a consensus across both groups and among all ages with what they associate with physical activity: Walking, playing with children, taking the stairs, gardening, raking leaves, shoveling snow (and other yard work), walking the dog, and cleaning the house or washing the car. The health benefits of these physical activities are well documented [13-15]. Knowing that most adults prefer lifestyle PA and largely associate, identify, and agree on various lifestyle physical activities, the medical community and health professionals have an obligation to educate themselves and the public on the importance of promoting lifestyle PA. Furthermore, practitioners should help their patients and the public at large to feel comfortable and confident fulfilling their PA in and around the home and work, and not necessarily at the gym. "Exercise is Medicine", but if the majority of adults will not partake in traditional activities, even though they appreciate exercise, nor have any desire to want to participate in exercise, the medical community must consider what is most meaningful for their patients instead of preaching a "one size fits all" narrative. Furthermore, medical and health practitioners must welcome lifestyle PA into their own lives before teaching and supporting others to include lifestyle PA in their own day to day life. This study points to the direction that many people want to be supported to embrace their own PA world, unique to each person, and not necessarily include organized exercise.

The descriptions that adults associate with exercise are important because, overall, this outlook can affect one's attitude towards exercise and the frequency it is engaged in [16]. In the larger picture, one's exercise frequency has a direct impact on overall exercise adherence and therefore, general health outcome. Some of the responses, indicated in Table 6 to descriptors associated with exercise, underscore the variability in terms of how well people "buy in" to the exercise prescription. Generally, fewer than half of the participants found exercise to be fun or enjoyable. However, there was a wide range of responses in terms of associating exercise with being "painful...", "not rewarding...", and "impractical...". Therefore, it is paramount for individuals to realize that it is natural to not enjoy more formal exercise, and more importantly, to understand that incorporating PA into their lifestyle in a more natural way can be impactful on their health. Because some of the exercise descriptive associations potentially pose as obstacles towards participation in exercise and PA, the fewer the obstacles, the higher the intrinsic motivation to customize PA to each individual realizing individuality and uniqueness [17].

Physicians and health professionals must also understand that many patients prefer a home-based PA program (especially if they are recovering) primarily reflecting lifestyle PA, and a patient-centered approach, emphasizing what is best for that person. In addition, most patients understand the value of PA and how it relates to their well-being and lifelong health [18]. As a result, the time is ripe for the medical community as educators to support peoples' preferences towards exercise and PA with a persuasive tone and convincing enthusiasm. Considering our current Covid-19 pandemic environment, and knowing the role PA plays in overall health, one's life may literally depend on adhering to a meaningful PA relationship in order to combat chronic diseases and improve quality of life.

Limitations and Conclusion

Limitations of the current study include a lack representation of certain ethnic groups, as the vast majority of participants identified as White/Caucasian. There were also very few smokers. While we attempted to include many diverse community groups, we cannot exclude the possibility that responses from other regions of either country could be different. The current study also does not include responses from the elderly population i.e. 65 years and older. Since the majority of adults prefer lifestyle PA, perhaps health and medical professionals should consider a paradigm addition of "Lifestyle Physical Activity is Medicine" in order to support peoples' preferences for movement that is more meaningful to them. More importantly, the medical community must become more educated about the benefits of lifestyle PA and exemplify accordingly in their own day to day activities while supporting and encouraging their communities to be lifestyle physically active. The scores of years spent overwhelmingly advocating mainly a more traditional way of moving has done our populations a disservice due to lack of adherence. Exercise is respected by many but only partaken by few. Therefore, let's broaden the approach to helping people help themselves be more successful in meeting our PA guidelines.

Acknowledgements

Dr. Cavallini was the recipient of a US Fulbright Scholarship in 2014-2015 during which time this study was conducted.

Statement of Competing Interests

The authors have no competing interests.

References

  1. Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair SN, Haskell WL, Macera CA, et al. (1995) Physical activity and public health. A recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. JAMA 273: 402-407.
  2. Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology (2012) [Canadian Physical Activity Guidelines].
  3. Colley RC, Garriguet D, Janssen I, Craig CL, Clarke J, et al. (2011) Physical activity of Canadian adults: Accelerometer results from the 2007 to 2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey. Health Rep 22: 7-14.
  4. Shields M, Tremblay MS, Laviolette M, Craig CL, Janssen I, et al. (2010) Fitness of Canadian adults: Results from the 2007-2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey. Health Rep 21.
  5. United States Department of Health and Human Services (2018) Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity and Obesity.
  6. Burton NW, Khan A, Brown WJ (2012) How, where and with whom? Physical activity context preferences of three adult groups at risk of inactivity. Br J Sports Med 46: 1125-1131.
  7. Cavallini MF, Kolen AM, Sui X, Spriet LL, Kang B, et al. (2017) Introducing My House Activity and MyWork Activity: A Paradigm Shift towards Lifestyle Physical Activity Supported by Evidence from a Focus Group Study. Journal of Physical Activity Research 2: 61-67.
  8. Salmon J, Owen N, Crawford D, Bauman A, Sallis JF (2003) Physical activity and sedentary behavior: A population-based study of barriers, enjoyment, and preference. Health Psychol 22: 178-188.
  9. Cavallini MF, Dyck DJ (2019) Fostering a culture of lifestyle physical activity that is relatable for all individuals and communities to embrace. American Journal of Public Health Research 7: 182-188.
  10. Cervone D, Wood R (1995) Goals, feedback, and the differential influence of self-regulatory processes on cognitively complex performance. Perceptual & Motor Skills 97: 689-696.
  11. Garcia AW, King AC (1991) Predicting long-term adherence to aerobic exercise: A comparison of two models. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology 13: 394-410.
  12. Cavallini MF, Dyck DJ, Sui X, Kang B, Kraft E, et al. (In press) Perceived barriers to physical activity in Canadian adult males and females. Journal of Behavioral and Social Science.
  13. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Herrmann SD, Meckes N, Bassett DR, et al. (2011) 2011 compendium of physical activities: A second update of codes and MET values. Med Sci Sports Exerc 43: 1575-1581.
  14. Huerta JM, Chirlaque MD, Tormo MJ, Buckland G, Ardanaz E, et al. (2016) Work, household, and leisure-time physical activity and risk of mortality in the EPIC-Spain cohort. Preventive Medicine 85: 106-112.
  15. Samitz G, Egger, M, Zwahlen M (2011) Domains of physical activity and all-cause mortality: Systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of cohort studies. Int J Epidemiol 40: 1382-1400.
  16. Theodorakis Y (1994) Planned behavior, attitude strength, self-identify, and the perception of exercise behavior. The Sport Psychologist 8: 149-165.
  17. Papacharisis V, Goudas M (2003) Perceptions about exercise and intrinsic motivation of students attending a health-related physical education program. Percept Mot Skills 97: 689-696.
  18. Smaradottir A, Smith AL, Borgert AJ, Oettel KR (2017) Are We on the Same Page? Patient and Provider Perceptions About Exercise in Cancer Care: A Focus Group Study. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 15: 588-594.

Citation

Cavallini MF, Dyck DJ (2020) Exercise is Medicine! Why are People not Buying into the Prescription?. J Fam Med Dis Prev 6:125. doi.org/10.23937/2469-5793/1510125