Rabkin SW (2018) Measurement of the QT Interval: Lessons from Thirty-Two Animal Species for the Correction of the QT Interval by Heart Rate. Int J Clin Cardiol 5:127.

REVIEW ARTICLE | OPEN ACCESSDOI: 10.23937/2378-2951/1410127

Measurement of the QT Interval: Lessons from Thirty-Two Animal Species for the Correction of the QT Interval by Heart Rate

Simon W Rabkin*

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Canada



The optimal method to correct the QT interval, an important indication of arrhythmia risk, for the impact of heart rate has been controversial. The fundamental biologic relationship of the QT interval-heart rate relationship has rarely been studied across different species.


The literature on the QT and heart rate of 32 different species was examined specifically in the whales, dolphins, Asian elephants, rhinoceros, camels, brown bears, grizzly bear, lions, tigers, sea lions, seals, donkeys, ponies, horses, cows, sheep, goats, llamas & alpacas, swine, Minipigs, deer, dogs, cats, baboons, apes, monkeys, prairie dogs, marmot, rabbit, hamsters, guinea pigs and mice.


An inverse relationship between QT interval and heart rate was apparent across species. The relationship was poorly fit by a linear formula. The Bazett approach (square root of heart rate or RR interval) or the Fridericia approach (cubed root of the heart rate or RR interval) produced slight improvements. Second, third and fourth order polynomials produced a progressive greater improvement in the goodness of the fit of the relationship. The best fit of the relationship was attained by a nonlinear two-phase relationship identifying that there is one QT-heart rate relationship at slower heart rates and one at faster heart rates.


The Bazett, Fridericia and linear formulae approaches to QT interval correction for the impact of heart are far from ideal. Nonlinear QT correction approaches are better approaches to correct the QT interval for heart rate.


QT interval, Heart rate, Animal species


The QT interval is an important index in assessing cardiac drug toxicity, electrolyte abnormalities and inherited channelopathies which can be associated with fatal arrhythmias [1-5]. A key issue in the utilization of the QT interval, is the need to appropriately adjust or correct for the impact of heart rate on the QT interval. Many formulae have been proposed to correct for the impact of heart rate on the QT interval so that the underlying QT interval can be assessed (for a review see [6]). The approach of Bazett, that the impact of heart rate can be corrected by dividing the QT interval by the square root of heart rate [7] and the approach of Fridericia that the QT interval needs to be divided by the cubed root of the heart rate (RR interval) [8], are still in use today. Mathematical equation - linear, exponential, cubic etc. have been applied to ECGs from patients and large populations in an attempt to adjust for the effect of heart rate on the QT interval [6]. Testing for the validity of approaches to adjust or correct for the impact of heart rate on the QT interval has been conducted within or between individuals and mainly in humans. There is a paucity of data that attempts to examine the fundamental nature of the QT-heart rate relationship across a large number of animal species. Cross species data would permit an exploration of the fundamental biologic relationship and should provide novel insights into heart rate-QT interval dependence. The objective of this study was to examine the QT-heart rate relationship across a variety of mammalian species in order to define the specific nature of this relationship.


A literature search was conducted using the terms electrocardiogram or electrocardiographic AND normal AND Animals. Birds or avian species were excluded. When there were few or no publications, the search was repeated by replacing animals with a pre-specified animal species. The objective was to obtain a cross section of animals and not to obtain a list of all publications on the ECGs of a given animal species. ECG monitoring done as part of an experiment or intervention protocol were excluded if there were more than two other articles in the species. Articles that were not in English or did not have English translations were not included.

Studies were excluded if data on the actual QT measurement were not presented or if it could not be readily calculated from QT interval corrected for heart rate i.e. the actual formula for calculation was not provided to permit calculation of the uncorrected QT interval; for example if QT was said to be corrected by the Bazett formula and the original paper was cited [7]. In the original paper by Bazett [7], a different constant was included for men and women so that it could not be known whether the investigator used the constant for male and female animals.

The QT-heart rate relationship was examined by several models considering linear or polynomial relationships. Log transformation and a nonlinear fit of the data were also applied. The least squares estimate of the relationship was calculated and the correlation (r2) was reported.


Data on thirty-two species of animals represents a wide spectrum of animals (Table 1). ECG data are inclusive of animals that spend most or a considerable amount of their life in water such as whales [9], dolphins [10,11], sea lions [12] and seals [13]. They include wild animals such as brown bears from either a sanctuary or caught in the wild [14,15], lions and tigers [16,17]. They include large animals such as Asian elephant [18-21] and small animals such as guinea pigs [22,23]. Some animals are not readily available for study such as rhinoceros [24] and grizzly bears [25] because of the difficulty in capturing them for study.

Table 1: It shows the types of species and whether they were anesthetized and/or the type of anaesthetic used. View Table 1

Domesticated animals have been studied in larger numbers and include cows (N = 1247) [26-28], donkeys (N = 240) [29,30], goats (N = 344) [28,31], camels (N = 146) [32,33], llamas and alpacas (N = 156) [34-36] and cats [37-39]. Various kinds of horses (N = 918) have had an ECG including Andalusian, thoroughbreds and standard horses [40,41] as well as ponies [42]. Dogs were analyzed by separating the species into beagles and other dogs [43-45] because of the very large number of beagles (N = 2,901) that had ECGs [46-49]. There were a number of different species of monkeys but because each group was of similar size they were combined [50-55]. Baboon were studied in primate colonies so relatively large numbers were available [56-58].

The sample size for each species varied widely. The ECG of the whale illustrates that in some circumstances, there are animals that are difficult to obtain. To exclude animals because only one animal was studied would eliminate one of the rare times that the species was examined with an electrocardiogram [9,24]. On the other hand, the ECG of a single polar bear was excluded because there were sufficient number of ECGs of other bears [9,14].

The QT intervals of younger and older guinea pigs conducted by Shintani, et al. were combined [22] to make it consistent with most of the studies that did not consider age in QT calculations.

The health status of some of the animals was reported. When studied in colonies or in laboratory settings, it was most likely accurate, when the animals were reported as being healthy. Most studies did not report on the health status of the animals and the animals were assumed to be healthy. The single whale, studied by Senft and Kanwisher, was a beached whale that died 7 hours after the ECG was taken so its health status at the time of the ECG could be questioned [9]. However, it may have been in an acceptable condition at the time the ECG was recorded.

The surroundings and conditions for the ECG may have impacted the heart rate. Some studies were conducted with anaesthetized animals because anesthesia was obviously necessary when dealing with animals such as wild bears, lions, and tigers. Different anaesthetics were used; making it difficult to compare or isolate the effect of anesthesia. Animals that were not anesthetized were restrained. For some animals, restraint may not have been a major inconvenience as they were likely well acquainted with the handler but other animals may have had faster heart rates when restrained.

The ECG studies on dolphins included wild dolphins that were recently captured and had a higher heart rate than the other group of dolphins that had been trained and exposed to humans for a long time [10,11]. However, other factors may have influenced the slight differences in heart rate between these animals.

It is readily apparent that there is an inverse relationship between QT interval and heart rate (Figure 1). The shortest QT intervals and fastest heart rates was seen in mice, guinea pigs and hamsters. The longest QT was found in whales, rhinoceros and elephants that had slower heart rates. A linear relationship, between QT and heart rate was significant but it did not represent a good description of the relationship with many values above and below the calculated linear fit and with an r2 value of 0.454 (Figure 2a). The Bazett approach of using the square root of the heart rate or RR interval [7] only slightly improved the fit (r2 = 0.609). Similarly the Fridericia approach of using the cube root of the RR interval or heart rate [59] slightly improved the correlation (r2 = 0.649). The nonlinearity of the relationship remained evident. The relationship was better fit with a second order polynomial (r2 = 0.689) (Figure 2b), third order polynomial (r2 = 0.783) (Figure 2c) and a 4th order polynomial (r2 = 0.832) (Figure 2d).

Figure 1: It shows the mean heart rate and QT interval for the species examined. The different species included are listed in close proximity to their QT and heart rate data. View Figure 1

Figure 2: a) It shows the best fit of a linear relationship between heart rate and QT interval; b) It shows the best fit of a second order polynomial relationship between heart rate and QT interval; c) It shows the best fit of a third order polynomial relationship between heart rate and QT interval; d) It shows the best fit of a fourth order polynomial relationship between heart rate and QT interval. View Figure 2

However, it is not until nonlinearity was examined did the relationship truly improve. The log transformation of both the QT interval and heart rate produced an r2 of 0.868 (Figure 3). A true nonlinear two phase (decay) equation fit the data best with an r2 = 0.909 (Figure 4). Because the Whale had the longest QT, the data were reanalyzed excluding the whale. The nonlinear goodness of fit was minimally altered with the removal of this species (r2 = 0.905).

Figure 3: It shows the relationship between heart rate and QT interval after both are subject to log transformation. View Figure 3

Figure 4: Shows the best fit of a nonlinear fit of the relationship between heart rate and QT interval. View Figure 4


This cross species examination of heart rate-QT interval data not only validates within species conclusions, that there is an inverse relationship between heart rate and QT interval but most importantly demonstrates that the relationship is not well described by either a linear model or the Bazett or Fridericia adjustment approaches. Higher order polynomial formulae improve the fit of the QT-heart rate relationship. Nonlinear models, however, are the best approach to describe (fit) the relationship between the QT interval and heart rate.

While recognizing the relationship between QT interval and heart rate, some investigators contend that the QT interval is regulated by mechanisms separate from those that govern heart rate so that QT interval and heart rate are influenced not only by heart rate but also by other factors including sympathetic neurones that are activated differently depending on the adaptation required [60-62]. Restating this proposal is that the effects of the sympathetic nervous system are not limited only to the effect of the autonomic system on heart rate. Tests of this concept, however, have relied on changing heart rate in an individual using interventions such as exercise or pacing [60-62] that still show a linkage between QT and heart rate [63,64]. The present study permits a different kind of examination of the QT-heart rate relationship by permitting an evaluation of the intrinsic heart rate differences in different animal species. The inverse relationship of QT interval and heart rate was obvious and can be illustrate in three species. In the Asian elephant, the QT interval was 660 ms at a heart rate of 35 bpm, QT interval of 191 ms at a heart rate of 115 bpm was found in the beagle dog, while the QT interval of 111 msec at a heart rate of 300 bpm was found in the guinea pig. These data reinforce the concept that heart rate has a powerful effect on QT interval.

This study has important implications for cardiologic assessment in humans. The Bazett [7] and the Fridericia formulae [8] for heart rate correction of the QT interval are in wide spread usage in clinical medicine. This study found that both formulae were inadequate to describe the QT-heart rate relationship across species. Support for these findings can be found in other reports [65,66]. Linear models have been advanced to better describe the QT-heart rate relationship [67,68]. A linear model did not fit the cross-sectional animal data. While polynomial models were better, they were not optimal. A true nonlinear two phase (decay) equation fit the data best). These data suggest that slow heart rates need one adjustment for heart rate and faster heart rates require another adjustment. This finding supports the use of a spline function which can adjust for the slow and fast heart rates differently [66].

Voltage-gated potassium currents/channels underlie ventricular repolarization and thereby influence the QT interval. Transient outward K currents (Ito) with fast inactivation (Ito,f) have been identified in cat, dog, ferret, human, mouse and rat ventricle while those with slow inactivation (Ito,s) have been characterized in ferret, human, mouse rabbit and rat ventricle [69]. Delayed rectifier K+ currents (IK) have multiple components that have been characterized in ventricular myocytes isolated from dog, cat guinea pig, human, rabbit and mouse [69]. Amongst the prominent components of IK, IKr (IK,rapid) has been characterized in cat, dog, guinea-pig, human, mouse, rabbit and rat ventricle with IKs (IK,slow) having been characterized in dog, guinea-pig and human ventricle [69]. Differences in repolarization between mammals evolves through changes in the amount expression of the relevant ion channels [70]. Differences in the magnitude of the outward potassium current between species has been proposed to explain differences in assessing the interval between the QRS complex and T wave in mice and rats compared to guinea pigs [71]. The pore-forming subunit of the rapid component of the delayed rectifier K channel, Kv11.1 [72], has similar electrophysiological gating properties in the horse compared to human (KV11.1 channels) [73]. This channel protein is encoded by ERG (Ether-a-go-go-Related Gene) which has the gene name KCNH2 [72]. There are multiple forms of ERG [72,74]. Ventricular IKr channels heteromers, ERG-1a and -1b, are expressed in rat, canine, and human heart [74]. In summary there are considerable similarities between mammalian species in the underlying mechanisms responsible for repolarization which dictates the duration of the QT interval.


There are a number of potential limitations of this study that warrant discussion. First, there is considerable heterogeneity in the circumstances surrounding ECG measurement as mentioned previously. Some animals were anesthetized while other were not. The nature of the anesthetic varied between studies so that comparisons of anesthetized and unanesthetized animals was not possible. The need to anesthetize some animals, such as grizzly bears or tigers is obvious; otherwise the 12 lead ECG could not be taken. Unanesthetized animals were either restrained or placed in a confined environment. Totally domesticated animals required minimal restrains while others required more restraint. Second, details of the method of QT interval measurement varied widely between publications so that the quality of the measurements could not be assessed. Third, the accuracy of the QT interval measurement likely varied, as it is much easier for it to be measured at slower rather than faster heart rates and there are a number of species that have fast resting heart rates. Fourth, the electrophysiological properties of the heart may vary between species and may be a factor influencing the QT interval independent of heart rate. Cattle and other ruminant have a different distribution of the Purkinje network penetrating the ventricular walls [75,76]. Depolarization, which utilizes the Purkinje network, however, is a different process from repolarization and is independent of the Purkinje network. Fifth, there were inconsistency in the reporting of animal age or sex so that it was not possible to analyze age or sex differences in the QT interval across species utilizing the data set. Sixth, the possibility exists that the nonlinearity evident at slow heart rates might be due to the few animals with slow heart rates. This was likely not the case. Reanalysis after the whale was removed did not materially affect the underlying relationships. Furthermore, there were a large number of other animals with slow heart rates. Lastly, clinical cardiology is focused on the human condition and the extent to which animal data can be extrapolated to the human condition is always a concern. However, the wide range of animal species examined in this study contributes to the basic understanding of the heart rate-QT interval relationship.

In conclusion, this study provides a unique assembly of data across thirty-two different species to examine the QT-heart rate relationship. The data are clearly nonlinear and indicate that the linear approach or the approaches of Bazett or Fridericia are not ideal but rather a nonlinear approach is best to correct or adjust the QT interval for the effect of heart rate. The data support the new spline equation to adjust the QT interval for the impact of heart rate on QT measurement.


There was no funding for this study.


The author declares no conflicts of interest.


  1. Kannankeril P, Roden DM, Darbar D (2010) Drug-induced long QT syndrome. Pharmacol Rev 62: 760-781.
  2. Rabkin SW (2014) Aging effects on QT interval: Implications for cardiac safety of antipsychotic drugs. J Geriatr Cardiol 11: 20-25.
  3. US Department of Health and Human Services F and D, Administration (2005) E14 Clinical evaluation of QT/QTc interval prolongation and proarrhythmic potential for non-antiarrhythmic drugs.
  4. Whitted AD, Stanifer JW, Dube P, Borkowski BJ, Yusuf J, et al. (2010) A dyshomeostasis of electrolytes and trace elements in acute stressor states: Impact on the heart. Am J Med Sci 340: 48-53.
  5. Bokil NJ, Baisden JM, Radford DJ, Summers KM (2010) Molecular genetics of long QT syndrome. Mol Genet Metab 101: 1-8.
  6. Rabkin SW, Cheng XB (2015) Nomenclature, categorization and usage of formulae to adjust QT interval for heart rate. World J Cardiol 7: 315-325.
  7. Bazett H (1920) An analysis of the time-relations of electrocardiograms. Heart 7: 353-367.
  8. Fridericia LS (2003) The duration of systole in an electrocardiogram in normal humans and in patients with heart disease. 1920. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 8: 343-351.
  9. Senft AW, Kanwisher JK (1960) Cardiographic observations on a fin-back whale. Circulation Research 8: 961-964.
  10. Hamlin RL, Jackson RF, Himes JA, Pipers FS, Townsend AC (1970) Electrocardiogram of bottle-nosed dolphin (Tursiops truncatus). Am J Vet Res 31: 501-505.
  11. Harms CA, Jensen ED, Townsend FI, Hansen LJ, Schwacke LH, et al. (2013) Electrocardiograms of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) out of water: Habituated collection versus wild postcapture animals. J Zoo Wildl Med 44: 972-981.
  12. Dassis M, Rodriguez DH, Rodriguez E, Ponce de Leon A, Castro E (2016) The electrocardiogram of anaesthetized southern sea lion (Otaria flavescens) females. J Vet Cardiol 18: 71-78.
  13. Falabella V, Campagna C, Lewis M (1999) Electrocardiography of southern elephant seal (Mirounga leonina) weanlings. J Zoo Wildl Med 30: 526-531.
  14. Gandolf AR, Fahlman A, Arnemo JM, Dooley JL, Hamlin R (2010) Baseline normal values and phylogenetic class of the electrocardiogram of anesthetized free-ranging brown bears (Ursus arctos). J Wildl Dis 46: 724-730.
  15. Cihan H, Yilmaz Z, Aytug N (2016) Evaluation of cardiogenic functions in captive Eurasian brown bears (Ursus arctos arctos) in Turkey. J Zoo Wildl Med 47: 120-126.
  16. Oda SGS, Yamato RJ, Fedullo JDL, Leomil Neto M, Larsson MH (2009) Standardization of some electrocardiographic parameters of captive leopard cats (Leopardus tigrinus). J Zoo Wildl Med 40: 414-420.
  17. sLarsson MHMA, Coelho FM, Oliveira VMC, Yamaki FL, Pereira GG, et al. (2008) Electrocardiographic parameters of captive lions (Panthera leo) and tigers (Panthera tigris) immobilized with ketamine plus xylazine. J Zoo Wildl Med 39: 314-319.
  18. Bartlett SL, Abou-Madi N, Kraus MS, Wiedner EB, Starkey SR, et al. (2009) Electrocardiography of the Asian elephant (Elephas maximus). J Zoo Wildl Med 40: 466-473.
  19. Chai N, Pouchelon JL, Bouvard J, Sillero LC, Huynh M, et al. (2016) Pproposed simple method for electrocardiogram recording in free-ranging Asian elephants (Elephas maximus). J Zoo Wildl Med 47: 6-11.
  20. Geddes LA (2002) Electrocardiograms from the turtle to the elephant that illustrate interesting physiological phenomena. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 25: 1762-1770.
  21. Jayasinghe J, Fernando SA, Brito-Babapulle L (1963) The electrocardiographic pat terns of Elephas maximus - the elephant of Ceylon. British Veterinary Journal 19: 559-564.
  22. Shiotani M, Harada T, Abe J, Hamada Y, Horii I (2008) Aging-related changes of QT and RR intervals in conscious guinea pigs. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 57: 23-29.
  23. Cieslar G, Sieron A, Rzepka E, Zmudzinski J, Franek A (1986) Normal electrocardiogram in guinea pig. Acta Physiol Pol 37: 139-149.
  24. Jayasinghe JB, Silva V (1972) Electrocardiographic study on the African black rhinoceros. Br Vet J 128.
  25. Folk G E, Dickson EW, Hunt JM, Nilles EJ, Thrift DL (2008) QT intervals compared in small and large hibernators and humans. Biol Rhythm Res 39: 427-438.
  26. Rezakhani A, Paphan A, Shekarfroush S (2004) Analysis of base apex lead electrocardiograms of normal dairy cows. Vet Arch 74: 351-358.
  27. De Roth L (1980) Electrocardiographic parameters in the normal lactating Holstein cow. Can Vet J 21: 271-277.
  28. Schultz RA, Pretorius PJ (1972) An electrocardiographic study of normal goats and cattle using a modified technique. Onderstepoort J Vet Res 39: 209-223.
  29. Rezakhani A, Yazdanmehr MM (1977) The normal electrocardiographic parameters of the domestic donkey (Equus asinus). Zentralbl Veterinarmed A 24: 672-679.
  30. Escudero A, Gonzalez JR, Benedito JL, Prieto FR, Ayala I (2009) Electrocardiographic parameters in the clinically healthy Zamorano-leones donkey. Res Vet Sci 87: 458-461.
  31. Szabuniewicz M, Clark DR (1967) Analysis of the electrocardiograms of 100 normal goats. Am J Vet Res 28: 511-516.
  32. Rezakhani A, Szabuniewicz M (1977) The electrocardiogram of the camel (Camelus dromedarius). Zentralbl Veterinarmed A 24: 277-286.
  33. Jayasinghe JB, Fernando DA, Brito-Babapulle LA (1963) The electrocardiogram of the camel. Am J Vet Res 24: 883-885.
  34. Bastres MC, Sakabe N, Yasuda J, Too K (1989) Electrocardiogram studies in llamas. Jpn J Vet Res 37: 85-95.
  35. Ferasin L, Ogden DM, Davies SJ, Kirby RJ, D'Alterio GL (2005) Electrocardiographic parameters of normal alpacas (Lama pacos). Vet Rec 157: 341-343.
  36. Kraus MS, Calvert CA, Spier AW, Meurs KM, Anderson DE (2004) Determination of electrocardiographic parameters in healthy llamas and alpacas. Am J Vet Res 65: 1719-1723.
  37. Tilley LP, Gompf RE (1977) Feline electrocardiography. Vet Clin North Am 7: 257-272.
  38. Rogers WA, Bishop SP (1971) Electrocardiographic parameters of the normal domestic cat: A comparison of standard limb leads and an orthogonal system. J Electrocardiol 4: 315-321.
  39. Calvert CA, Coulter DB (1981) Electrocardiographic values for anesthetized cats in lateral and sternal recumbencies. Am J Vet Res 42: 1453-1455.
  40. Fregin GF (1982) The equine electrocardiogram with standardized body and limb positions. Cornell Vet 72: 304-324.
  41. Ayala I, Montes A, Bernal LJ, Sandoval JA, Gutierrez C (1995) Electrocardiographic values in Spanish-bred horses of different ages. Aust Vet J 72: 225-226.
  42. Buss DD, Rwalings CA, Bisgard GE (1975) The normal electrocardiogram of the domestic pony. J Electrocardiol 8: 167-172.
  43. Lombard EA, Witham C (1955) Electrocardiogram of the anesthetized dog. Am J Physiol 181: 567-574.
  44. Hill JD (1968) The electrocardiogram in dogs with standardized body and limb positions. J Electrocardiol 1: 175-182.
  45. Rezakhani A, Atwell RB, Webster J (1990) Electrocardiographic values of german shepherd dogs. Aust Vet J 67: 307-309.
  46. Osborne BE, Leach GDH (1972) The Beagle electrocardiogram. Food Chem Toxicol 6: 127-133.
  47. Eckenfels A, Trieb G (1979) The normal electrocardiogram of the conscious beagle dog. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 47: 567-584.
  48. Hanton G, Rabemampianina Y (2006) The electrocardiogram of the Beagle dog: Reference values and effect of sex, genetic strain, body position and heart rate. Lab Anim 40: 123-136.
  49. Petersen E, Ricketts H, Brewer N, Lints H, Test C, et al. (1951) Electrocardiogram of the beagle dog. Proc Soc Exp Biol 77: 330-332.
  50. Szabuniewicz M, Schwartz WL, McCrady JD, Russell LH (1971) The electrocardiogram, vectorcardiogram and spatiocardiogram in the Capuchin monkey (Cebus apella). Zentralbl Veterinarmed A18: 206-218.
  51. Atta AG, Vance PW (1960) Electrocardiographic studies in the macaca mulatta monkey. Ann N Y Acad Sci 85: 811-818.
  52. Malinow MR (1966) An electrocardiographic study of macaca mulatta. Folia Primatol (Basel) 4: 51-65.
  53. Malinow MR, DeLannoy CWJ (1967) The electrocardiogram of macaca fuscata. Folia Primatol (Basel) 7: 284-291.
  54. Wolf RH, Lehner ND, Miller EC, Clarkson TB (1969) Electrocardiogram of the squirrel monkey, Saimiri sciureus. J Appl Physiol 26: 346-351.
  55. Huss MK, Ikeno F, Buckmaster CL, Albertelli MA (2015) Echocardiographic and electrocardiographic characteristics of male and female squirrel monkeys (Saimiri spp.). J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 54: 25-28.
  56. Osborne BE, Roberts CN (1972) The electrocardiogram (ECG) of the baboon (Papio spp.). Lab Anim 6: 127-133.
  57. Kaminer B (1958) The electrocardiogram of the baboon (Papio ursinus). South African J Med Sci 23: 231.
  58. Herrmann G, Williams de H AH, Overall J, Kreiwaldt F, Claborn L (1965) Electrocardiographic data on Papio cynocephalus Baboons from Darijani and from Nairobi. in: Baboon in Medical Reearch 2: 522-533.
  59. Fridericia L (1920) Die sytolendauer in elektrokardiogramm bei normalen menschen und bei herzkranken. Acta Med Scand 53: 469-486.
  60. Huang MH, Wolf SG, Armour JA (1995) Shortening of the QT interval of the EKG is associated primarily with increased ventricular contractility rather than heart rate. Integr Physiol Behav Sci 30: 5-11.
  61. Akhras F, Rickards AF (1981) The relationship between QT interval and heart rate during physiological exercise and pacing. Jpn Heart J 22: 345-351.
  62. Davidowski TA, Wolf S (1984) The QT interval during reflex cardiovascular adaptation. Circulation 69: 22-25.
  63. Rabkin SW, Cheng X (2016) Newer QT Correction Formulae to Correct QT for Heart Rate Changes During Exercise. Am J Med Sci 351: 133-139.
  64. Nouraei H, Rabkin SW (2017) Value of a new QTc formula to adjust for the impact of heart rate. 33: S202-S203.
  65. Indik J, Pearson E, Fried K, Woosley R (2006) Bazett and Fridericia QT correction formulas interfere with measurement of drug-induced changes in QT interval. Heart Rhythm 3: 1003-1007.
  66. Rabkin SW, Szefer E, Thompson DJS (2017) A new QT interval correction formulae to adjust for increases in heart rate. J Am Coll Cardiol Clin EP 3: 756-766.
  67. Sagie A, Larson MG, Goldberg RJ, Bengtson JR, Levy D (1992) An improved method for adjusting the QT interval for heart rate (the Framingham Heart Study). Am J Cardiol 70: 797-801.
  68. Rautaharju PM, Mason JW, Akiyama T (2014) New age- and sex-specific criteria for QT prolongation based on rate correction formulas that minimize bias at the upper normal limits. Int J Cardiol 174: 535-540.
  69. Nerbonne JM (2000) Molecular basis of functional voltage-gated K+ channel diversity in the mammalian myocardium. J Physiol 2: 285-298.
  70. Rosati B, Dong M, Cheng L, Liou S-R, Yan Q, et al. (2008) Evolution of ventricular myocyte electrophysiology. Physiol Genomics 35: 262-272.
  71. Gussak I, Chaitman BR, Kopecky SL, Nerbonne JM (2000) Rapid ventricular repolarization in rodents: electrocardiographic manifestations, molecular mechanisms, and clinical insights. J Electrocardiol 33: 159-170.
  72. Vandenberg JI, Perry MD, Perrin MJ, Mann SA, Ke Y, et al. (2012) hERG K(+) channels: Structure, function, and clinical significance. Physiol Rev 92: 1393-1478.
  73. Pedersen PJ, Thomsen KB, Olander ER, Hauser F, Tejada M de los A, et al. (2015) Molecular cloning and functional expression of the equine K+ channel KV11.1 (Ether a Go-Go-Related/KCNH2 Gene) and the regulatory subunit KCNE2 from Equine Myocardium. PLoS One 10: e0138320.
  74. Jones EMC, Roti Roti EC, Wang J, Delfosse SA, Robertson GA (2004) Cardiac IKr channels minimally comprise hERG 1a and 1b subunits. J Biol Chem 279: 44690-44694.
  75. Abramson D, Margolin S (1936) A purkinje conduction network in the myocardium of the mammalian ventricles. J Anat 70: 250-259.
  76. Hamlin R, Glower DJ, Pimmel R (1984) Genesis of QRS in the ruminant: Graphic simulation. Am J Vet Res 45: 938-941.
  77. Bharati S, Levine M, Huang SK, Handler B, Parr GV, et al. (1991) The conduction system of the swine heart. Chest 100: 207-212.
  78. Santamarina G, Espino L, Suarez ML (2001) Electrocardiographic parameters of free-ranging roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). J Zoo Wildl Med 32: 441-446.
  79. Lord B, Boswood A, Petrie A (2010) Electrocardiography of the normal domestic pet rabbit. Vet Rec 167: 961-965.
  80. Hampton TG, Kale A, Mc Cue S, Bhagavan HN, Vandongen C (2012) Developmental changes in the ECG of a hamster model of muscular dystrophy and heart failure. Front Pharmacol 3: 80.
  81. Goldbarg AN, Hellerstein HK, Bruell JH, Daroczy AF (1968) Electrocardiogram of the normal mouse, Mus musculus: General considerations and genetic aspects. Cardiovasc Res 2: 93-99.


Rabkin SW (2018) Measurement of the QT Interval: Lessons from Thirty-Two Animal Species for the Correction of the QT Interval by Heart Rate. Int J Clin Cardiol 5:127.