Citation

Erkalp K, Erkalp NK, Erden V, Korkut AY, Abut YC (2019) Inhalation Induction in Tracheostomized Patients: Comparison of Desflurane and Sevoflurane. Int J Anesthetic Anesthesiol 6:089. doi.org/10.23937/2377-4630/1410089

Copyright

© 2019 Erkalp K, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE | OPEN ACCESS DOI: 10.23937/2377-4630/1410089

Inhalation Induction in Tracheostomized Patients: Comparison of Desflurane and Sevoflurane

Kerem Erkalp, MD1, Nuran Kalekoglu Erkalp, MD2, Veysel Erden, MD3, Arzu Yasemin Korkut, MD2, and Yesim Cokay Abut, MD3

1Anesthesiology and Reanimation Specialist, Bagcilar Educational and Training Hospital, Turkey

2Ear, Nose and Throat Specialist, Sisli Etfal Training Hospital, Turkey

3Anesthesiology and Reanimation Specialist, Istanbul Educational and Training Hospital, Turkey

Abstract

Background

Inhalation induction (II) of anesthesia is a commonly used method in difficult airway management, pediatric anesthesia and also tracheostomized patients' surgical practices. Sevoflurane and desflurane are the most common inhalation agents for II in these procedures of patients. We demonstrated that II with sevoflurane or desflurane in tracheostomized patients who are not studied up until now and their outcomes. Cardiorespiratory changes in II should be the same in tracheostomized patients with desflurane compared to sevoflurane.

Methods

We studied 60 adult tracheostomized patients (ASA physical status 2 or 3), scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia. Patients were allocated randomly to receive either desflurane (Group D) or sevoflurane (Group S) for II. Following 1 mg midazolam and 1 µg/kg fentanyl, all patients were intubated via tracheostomy with a montandon tracheostomy tube. In the Group D, patients were firstly instructed to breath and then they immediately started using desflurane and 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen (3/3 L). Desflurane was introduced at an inspired concentration of 3% and increased by 1% every 4-6 breaths as tolerated, up to a maximum of 12%. In the Group S, patients were also instructed to breathe firstly and then they immediately started using sevoflurane and 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen (3/3 L). Sevoflurane was introduced at an inspired concentration of 1% and increased by 0.3% every 4-6 breaths as tolerated, up to a maximum of 6%. Hemodynamic values [(SpO2, heart rate (HR) and arterial pressure (MAP)], respiratory complications (coughing, bronchospasm, desaturation, breath-holding), purposeful movement of limbs, secretions requiring removal by suction, time to loss of response to command and concentration of expired inhalation agent (desflurane or sevoflurane) were recorded for 10 minutes of II. Mean, standard deviation, frequency and percentage were used for descriptive statistics with SSPS 20.0.

Results

Couching, bronchospasm, desaturation, breath-holding and purposeful movements distributions did not show any differences in Group D and Group S. Requirement of secretion removal was higher in Group D. Hemodynamic values were more stable in Group S.

Conclusion

In tracheostomized patients' II; desflurane has similar airway irritation with sevoflurane but II is more stable with sevoflurane than desflurane.