Table 3: Comparing microbiological profile of our study with Doyle and Woodham [21], Busaba, et al. [22] and Irfan, et al. [20].
| Names of the Organisms | Present study out of 100 (%) | Doyle and Woodham out of 94 (%) | Busaba, et al. out of 179 (%) | Irfan, et al. out of 100 (%) |
| Staphylococcus aureus | 34 (34) | 31 (33) | 33 (18.4) | 46 (46) |
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa | 12 (12) | 1 (1.1) | 9 (5) | 1 (1) |
| Enterococcus faecalis | 3 (3) | 1 (1.1) | 0 | 0 |
| Escherichia coli | 2 (2) | 4 (4.2%) | 0 | 0 |
| Proteus mirabilis | 1 (1) | 8 (8.4%) | 0 | 0 |
| Citrobacter spp. | 1 (1) | 1 (1.1%) | 0 | 1 (1) |
| Streptococcus spp. | 0 | 5 (5.3) | 2 (1.1) | 2 (2) |
| Enterobacterspp. | 0 | 3 (3.2) | 6 (3.4) | 1 (1) |
| Klebsiella | 0 | 2 (2.1) | 4 (2.2) | 9 (9) |
| Actinomycetes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (1) |
| Haemophilus influenzae | 0 | 4 (4.3) | 8 (4.5) | 0 |
| Corynebacterium diphtheriae | 0 | 2 (2.1) | 0 | 0 |
| Botryomycosis | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (1) |
| Anaerobes | 0 | 0 | 11 (6.1) | 0 |
| Fungi | 3 (3) | 1 (1.1) | 0 | 9 (9) |