Table 1: Results for random half to half validation technique.
Variable | N = 59 | N = 29 | N = 30 |
Family farming (food production) | |||
Households with family agriculture | 18 (30.5%) | 8 (27.59%) | 10 (33.33%) |
Households without family agriculture | 41 (69.49%) | 21 (72.41%) | 20 (66.67%) |
Social Vulnerability: Presence of social protection and security (state coverage) | |||
Households with state coverage. | 19 (32.20%) | 10 (34.48%) | 9 (30.00%) |
Households without state coverage. | 40 (67.80%) | 19 (65.52%) | 21 (70.00%) |
Expenditure on food | |||
Food expenses (mean and standard deviation) | 514.915 (± 19,9494) | 558.621 (± 20,8339) | 472.667 (± 18,4203) |
Perception of climatic vulnerability in their diet: Drought | |||
Acute* | 44 (74.58%) | 24 (82.76%) | 20 (66.67%) |
Mild* | 10 (16.95%) | 3 (10.34%) | 7 (23.33%) |
Medium | 5 (8.47%) | 2 (6.90%) | 3 (10.00%) |
Perception of climatic vulnerability in their diet: Frost | |||
Acute | 40 (67.79%) | 21 (72.41%) | 19 (63.33%) |
Mild | 11 (18.64%) | 6 (20.68%) | 5 (16.66%) |
Medium* | 8 (13.55%) | 2 (6.89%) | 6 (20%) |
Perception of climatic vulnerability in their diet: Floods | |||
Acute* | 42 (71.19%) | 24 (82.76%) | 18 (60.00%) |
Mild* | 10 (16.95%) | 2 (6.90%) | 8 (26.67%) |
Medium | 7 (11.86%) | 3 (10.34%) | 4 (13.33%) |
*The 5 variables/categories (from 14) with an apparent high differences between groups.