Table 1: Results for random half to half validation technique.

Variable N = 59 N = 29 N = 30
Family farming (food production)
Households with family agriculture 18 (30.5%) 8 (27.59%) 10 (33.33%)
Households without family agriculture 41 (69.49%) 21 (72.41%) 20 (66.67%)
Social Vulnerability: Presence of social protection and security (state coverage)
Households with state coverage. 19 (32.20%) 10 (34.48%) 9 (30.00%)
Households without state coverage. 40 (67.80%) 19 (65.52%) 21 (70.00%)
Expenditure on food
Food expenses (mean and standard deviation) 514.915 (± 19,9494) 558.621 (± 20,8339) 472.667 (± 18,4203)
Perception of climatic vulnerability in their diet: Drought
Acute* 44 (74.58%) 24 (82.76%) 20 (66.67%)
Mild* 10 (16.95%) 3 (10.34%) 7 (23.33%)
Medium 5 (8.47%) 2 (6.90%) 3 (10.00%)
Perception of climatic vulnerability in their diet: Frost
Acute 40 (67.79%) 21 (72.41%) 19 (63.33%)
Mild 11 (18.64%) 6 (20.68%) 5 (16.66%)
Medium* 8 (13.55%) 2 (6.89%) 6 (20%)
Perception of climatic vulnerability in their diet: Floods
Acute* 42 (71.19%) 24 (82.76%) 18 (60.00%)
Mild* 10 (16.95%) 2 (6.90%) 8 (26.67%)
Medium 7 (11.86%) 3 (10.34%) 4 (13.33%)

*The 5 variables/categories (from 14) with an apparent high differences between groups.