Table 1: Number of infected cattle in each boma for the three study villages.
Village | Herd ID | Number of cattle sampled | Number of infected cattle in t1 | Number of infected cattle in t2 | Total infected |
Kimotorok | K1 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 3 (33.3%) |
Kimotorok | K2 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 (10%) |
Kimotorok | K3 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 2 (22.2%) |
Kimotorok | K4 | 10 | 0 | 3 | 3 (30%) |
Kimotorok | K5 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 3 (37.5%) |
Oltukai | O1 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 (10%) |
Oltukai | O2 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 2 (22.2%) |
Oltukai | O3 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 1 (10%) |
Oltukai | O4 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 (10%) |
Oltukai | O5 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 (10%) |
Sukuro | S1 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 2 (20%) |
Sukuro | S2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0%) |
Sukuro | S3 | 9 | 1 | 2s | 3 (33.3%) |
Sukuro | S4 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 1 (11.1%) |
Sukuro | S5 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0%) |
141 | 4 | 20 | 24 (17.02%) |