Table 1: Number of infected cattle in each boma for the three study villages.
| Village | Herd ID | Number of cattle sampled | Number of infected cattle in t1 | Number of infected cattle in t2 | Total infected |
| Kimotorok | K1 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 3 (33.3%) |
| Kimotorok | K2 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 (10%) |
| Kimotorok | K3 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 2 (22.2%) |
| Kimotorok | K4 | 10 | 0 | 3 | 3 (30%) |
| Kimotorok | K5 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 3 (37.5%) |
| Oltukai | O1 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 (10%) |
| Oltukai | O2 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 2 (22.2%) |
| Oltukai | O3 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 1 (10%) |
| Oltukai | O4 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 (10%) |
| Oltukai | O5 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 (10%) |
| Sukuro | S1 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 2 (20%) |
| Sukuro | S2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0%) |
| Sukuro | S3 | 9 | 1 | 2s | 3 (33.3%) |
| Sukuro | S4 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 1 (11.1%) |
| Sukuro | S5 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0%) |
| 141 | 4 | 20 | 24 (17.02%) |