Table 4: Results of included studies [7,10,16-22].
Author |
Year |
Osteoporosis |
Fall Risk |
Aibar-Almazán A, et al. [16] |
2018 |
None |
ABC 70.65 ± 19.86 vs 73,21 ± 20.20; FES-I 24.38 ± 7.14 vs 28.16 ± 9.04 |
Aubertin-Leheudre M, et al. [17] |
2008 |
Total BMD -0.12 ± 0.67; hip BMD -0.30 ± 0.44; spine BMD -0.76 ± 1.41 |
None |
Chung JH, et al. [18] |
2016 |
OR 8.67 (95% CI 4.19-17.94) |
None |
dos Santos VR, et al. [7] |
2017 |
BMD 0.87 g/cm2 vs 0.78 g/cm2; OR 1.66 (95% CI 0.50-5.48); OR 1.84 (95% CI 0.53-6.40) |
None |
Follis S, et al. [10] |
2018 |
None |
Greater risk of falls in women aged 50 to 64 (RR 1.35; 95% CI 1.17-1.56) and aged 65 to 79 (RR 1.21; 95% CI 1.05-1.39) |
Özturk ZA, et al. [19] |
2018 |
None |
Tinetti 22.4 ± 4.69 vs 22.5 ± 5.17; TGUG 14.9 ± 7.16 vs 11.7 ± 5.87 |
Scott D, et al. [20] |
2017 |
Fracture risk 2.38 (95% CI 1.29-4.36) |
Fall risk RR 1.66 (95% CI 1.16-2.37) |
Scott D, et al. [21] |
2016 |
Lower spine and total body BMD (and higher non-vertebral fracture risk (IRR 3.0; 95% CI 1.7-5.5 in men and IRR 2.8; 95% CI 1.4-5.6) |
Fall risk 0.28 ± 0.90 vs 0.17 ± 0.87 |
Waters DL, et al. [22] |
2009 |
Greater neck femur incidence in sarcopenic obese compared to normal or obese, but less to sarcopenic |
Falls/year 1.8 (95% CI 1.22-2.39) vs 1.3 (95% CI 0.87-1.70) |