Table 7: Overall findings.
|
Rrelevancy of IFST2BR |
No. of partecipants (n = 20) |
|||
|
All are relevant |
Some may not relevant |
Some are definitely not relevant |
||
|
Statistical Theory Side |
20 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Statistical Data Side |
19 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
Statistical Tests Side |
18 |
2 |
0 |
|
|
Overall relevancy |
20 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Understanding of IFST2BR |
All are relevant |
Some are definitely not relevant |
Some may not relevant |
|
|
Statistical Theory Side |
20 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Statistical Data Side |
20 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Statistical Tests Side |
19 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
Overall Understanding |
20 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Questions |
Strongly Agree |
Agree |
DisAgree |
Strongly DisAgree |
|
Q1: The connections and flows of all IFST2BR Framework components are logically appropriate. |
9 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
|
Q2: I found that proposed IFST2BR Framework components as part of biostatistics can be used as Evaluation interpretive guide by Budding Biological Researchers. |
8 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
|
A3: Overall, I found that the proposed IFST2BR Framework are readable and understanding |
15 |
5 |
0 |
0 |