Table 5: Logistic regression analysis of urinary complications and predictors using propensity score.

Parameter Estimate Odds ratio (95% CI) P value
Treatment
Conservative management
-0.1941 0.824 (0.769, 0.882) < 0.0001
Race
Black
Others
-0.2512
-0.0082
0.778 (0.690, 0.878)
0.992 (0.857, 1.148)
< 0.0001
0.9126
Marital status
Single
0.3679 1.445 (1.270, 1.644) < 0.0001
Age
66-69
70-74
75-79
-0.5685
-0.3062
-0.1647
0.566 (0.492, 0.652)
0.736 (0.638, 0.850)
0.848 (0.729, 0.987)
< 0.0001
< 0.0001
0.0333
Grade
Well-differentiated
-0.3074 0.735 (0.596, 0.908) 0.0042
Comorbidity
Null
One
-0.5763
-0.2433
0.562 (0.505, 0.625)
0.784 (0.696, 0.883)
< 0.0001
< 0.0001

Note: Model was found to be statistically significant. Result of likelihood ratio test: χ2 value - 404.668 and P value < 0.0001. CI indicates Confidence Interval. Base case includes patients who were in immediate treatment group, with race white, married, aged 80 or above, with moderately differentiated tumors and with greater than 1 comorbidities.