Articles selection results.

Table 2: Articles selection results.

	Authors	Year	Journal	Article	Surgical technique	Dentofacial deformities	Average age
1	Wolford, et al. [15]	2001	Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop	Review	Sagittal split ramus osteotomy Inverted “L” Osteotomy Vertical ramus osteotomy High condylectomy Anterior mandibular osteotomy Mandibular body osteotomy Genioplasty	Mandibular hypoplasia Mandibular hypoplasia Anterior mandibular dentoalveolar deformities Condilar hyperplasia	--
2	Wolford, et al. [12]	2001	Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop	Review	Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy Horseshoe maxillary osteotomy Anterior maxillary osteotomy	Maxillary osteotomy Sagittal maxillary excess Vertical maxillary hyperplasia	--
3	Villegas, et al. [6]	2010	J Clin Orthod	Case series	Le Fort I osteotomy Sagittal split ramus osteotomy High condylectomy Genioplasty	Vertical maxillary hyperplasia Mandibular hyperplasia Maxillary hypoplasia	Girls: 13.5 years
4	Capelli, et al. [7]	2012	Dental Press J Orthod	Case series	Le Fort I osteotomy Vertical ramus osteotomy	Mandibular hyperplasia Maxillary hypoplasia	Doesn’t specify
5	Huang, et al. [21]	1982	Am J Orthod	Observational	Vertical ramus osteotomy Sagittal split ramus osteotomy Anterior maxillary osteotomy Genioplasty	Mandibular hypoplasia	Boys: 14.1 years Girls: 13.4 years
6	Proffit, et al. [18]	2010	Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg	Observational	Doesn’t specify	Mandibular hypoplasia	Boys: 17.5 years Girls: 15 years
7	Washburn, et al. [13]	1982	J Oral Maxillofac Surg	Observational	Le Fort I osteotomy	Vertical maxillary hyperplasia	14.2 years
8	Mogavero, et al. [14]	1997	Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop	Clinical Trial	Le Fort I osteotomy	Vertical maxillary hyperplasia	14.5 years
9	Mojdehi, et al. [4]	2001	Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop	Observational	Le Fort I osteotomy	Vertical maxillary hyperplasia	12.8 years
10	Marangoni, et al. [22]	2016	J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg	Observational	Le Fort I osteotomy Sagittal split ramus osteotomy Genioplasty	Maxillary hyperplasia Mandibular hypoplasia Vertical maxillary hyperplasia Mandibular hyperplasia	14.5 years
11	Wolford, et al. [17]	1979	J Maxillofac Surg	Observational	Sagittal split ramus osteotomy	Mandibular hypoplasia	13.5 years
12	Precious, et al. [23]	1985	Int J Oral Surg	Observational	Le Fort I osteotomy Sagittal split ramus osteotomy Anterior maxillary osteotomy Vertical ramus osteotomy Mandibular body osteotomy Anterior mandibular subapical osteotomy Coronoidectomy	Vertical maxillary hyperplasia Mandibular hypoplasia Mandibular hyperplasia Maxillary hypoplasia Sagittal maxillary excess	13.9 years
13	O’Keefe, et al. [9]	2016	J Irish Dent Assoc	Case report	Le Fort I osteotomy Sagittal split ramus osteotomy	Maxillary hypoplasia Mandibular hyperplasia	15.5 years
14	Schendel, et al. [16]	1978	Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol	Observational	Sagittal split ramus osteotomy	Mandibular hypoplasia	13.5 years
15	Wolford, et al. [5]	2009	Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)	Observational	Le Fort I osteotomy Sagittal split ramus osteotomy High condylectomy	Condylar hyperplasia	Group 1: 17.5 years Group 2: 16.6 years
16	Bodine, et al. [19]	2016	Progress in Orthodontics	Observational	Doesn’t Specify	Adolescent internal condylary resorption	15.2 years
17	Hedge, et al. [8]	2012	Kathmandu Univ Med J	Case report	Anterior maxillary osteotomy	Vertical maxillary hyperplasia	Boys: 14 years
18	Galiano, et al. [20]	2017	CRANIO®	Observational	Doesn’t specify	Adolescent internal condylary resorption	16.5 years

Anomaly	Concomitant anomaly	Growth rate	Surgical technique	Considerations
Vertical maxillary hyperplasia	---	Increased	Le Fort I osteotomy	Sagittal growth inhibition
			Anterior maxillary osteotomy	Favorable vertical growth pattern
		Increased	Horseshoe maxillary osteotomy	Favorable vertical growth pattern
				Sagittal growth with possible few alterations
Sagittal maxillary excess	---	Increased	Le Fort I osteotomy	Sagittal growth inhibition
				A skeletal class III could be developed post-surgery
		Increased	Horseshoe maxillary osteotomy
				Sagittal growth with possible few alterations
				Election technique in these cases
	Vertical maxillary hyperplasia	Increased	Le Fort I osteotomy	Favorable vertical growth pattern
				Sagittal growth inhibition
	Vertical maxillary hyperplasia	Increased	Horseshoe maxillary osteotomy	Favorable vertical growth pattern
				Sagittal growth with possible few alterations
Maxillary hypoplasia	---	Decreased	Le Fort I osteotomy with overcorrection	A second surgery will probably be necessary at the end of growth
				Skeletal class III relapse
				Perform as closest to growth cessation as possible
	---	Decreased	Horseshoe maxillary osteotomy with overcorrection	Due to sagittal growth deficit, a second surgery will probably be necessary
				Skeletal class III relapse
				Perform as closest to growth cessation as possible
	Mandibular hyperplasia	Increased/decreased	Le Fort I osteotomy + BSSO + high condylectomy	Vertical mandibular growth inhibited in most part
				Perform as closest to growth cessation as possible
Mandibular hyperplasia	---	Normal	Uni/bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy	Unaltered post-surgical mandibular growth
		Increased	BSSO + high condylectomy	Most of mandibular growth inhibited.
				It can be simultaneous with the high condylectomy.
				At first a high condylectomy and in a second surgical time perform the orthognathic surgery
	Maxillary hypoplasia	Normal	Le Fort I osteotomy + BSSO + high condylectomy	Mandibular and sagittal maxillary growth inhibited with post-surgical stability
Mandibular hypoplasia	---	Normal	Uni/bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy + genioplasty	Mandibular post-surgical growth unaltered.

	---	Decreased	Uni/bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy + genioplasty	Another surgery will probably be necessary due to mandibular growth deficit
	Adolescent internal condylar resorption	Normal	Le Fort I osteotomy + BSSO + removal of bilaminar tissues and disc reposition	No post-surgical mandibular growth alterations. Stability in the long term.