Table 2: Intra-individual correlations.

Patient

PPG amp vs. PP

PPG amp vs. CVasc

Rho

P value

Rho

P value

1

-0.8374

< 0.0001

0.9078

< 0.0001

2

-0.9593

< 0.0001

0.9557

< 0.0001

3

-0.933

< 0.0001

0.9549

< 0.0001

4

-0.9822

< 0.0001

0.9817

< 0.0001

5

-0.9421

< 0.0001

0.9545

< 0.0001

6

0.9384

< 0.0001

0.9329

< 0.0001

7

-0.8402

< 0.0001

0.8744

< 0.0001

8

-0.4502

< 0.0001

0.5874

<0.0001

9

-0.885

< 0.0001

0.9044

< 0.0001

10

-0.7739

< 0.0001

0.9335

< 0.0001

11

-0.9836

< 0.0001

0.9815

< 0.0001

12

-0.875

< 0.0001

0.9177

< 0.0001

13

-0.8091

< 0.0001

0.8464

< 0.0001

14

-0.8717

< 0.0001

0.9121

< 0.0001

15

-0.8395

< 0.0001

0.9715

< 0.0001

16

-0.7442

< 0.0001

0.8605

< 0.0001

17

-0.9347

< 0.0001

0.9618

< 0.0001

18

-0.8554

< 0.0001

0.8877

< 0.0001

19

-0.7952

< 0.0001

0.9533

< 0.0001

20

-0.9105

< 0.0001

0.9782

< 0.0001

21

-0.7091

< 0.0001

0.7204

< 0.0001

22

-0.7724

< 0.0001

0.8879

< 0.0001

23

-0.9394

< 0.0001

0.9762

< 0.0001

24

-0.8019

< 0.0001

0.9034

< 0.0001

25

-0.8363

< 0.0001

0.9309

< 0.0001

26

-0.7629

< 0.0001

0.8812

< 0.0001

Periods of changes in arterial blood pressure were analyzed in each patient in a beat-by-beat basis. PPG: Photoplethysmography; PP: Pulse pressure, CVasc: Vascular compliance and # cycles: Number of cycles analyzed. Spearman’s correlation (Rho).