Table 4: The outcomes of lower limb angioplasty on treatment of patients with diabetic foot syndrome.
| 
				 
  | 
			
				 Count  | 
			
				 Column N%  | 
		|
| 
				 Complication after procedure  | 
			
				 No  | 
			
				 65  | 
			
				 94.2%  | 
		
| 
				 
  | 
			
				 Yes  | 
			
				 4  | 
			
				 5.8%  | 
		
| 
				 Complication  | 
			
				 Fever and given paracetamol  | 
			
				 2  | 
			
				 40.0%  | 
		
| 
				 Dissection at origin of peroneal artery  | 
			
				 1  | 
			
				 20.0%  | 
		|
| 
				 Severe hypotension and Green code then ptreturn normal.  | 
			
				 1  | 
			
				 20.0%  | 
		|
| 
				 Acute thrombosis of PTA and peroneal artery which was managed immediately by thrombectomy and thrombolysis post angiogram  | 
			
				 1  | 
			
				 20.0%  | 
		|
| 
				 Did the wound heal  | 
			
				 No  | 
			
				 12  | 
			
				 17.4%  | 
		
| 
				 Yes  | 
			
				 57  | 
			
				 82.6%  | 
		|
| 
				 Did the wound come back in the same place  | 
			
				 No  | 
			
				 62  | 
			
				 89.9%  | 
		
| 
				 Yes  | 
			
				 7  | 
			
				 10.1%  | 
		|
| 
				 Did you have another wound on same foot  | 
			
				 No  | 
			
				 58  | 
			
				 84.1%  | 
		
| 
				 Yes  | 
			
				 11  | 
			
				 15.9%  | 
		|
| 
				 Did you have a foot amputation, if yes, at any level?  | 
			
				 No  | 
			
				 51  | 
			
				 73.9%  | 
		
| 
				 1.00  | 
			
				 1  | 
			
				 1.4%  | 
		|
| 
				 Yes, above ankle  | 
			
				 2  | 
			
				 2.9%  | 
		|
| 
				 Yes, Below knee  | 
			
				 2  | 
			
				 2.9%  | 
		|
| 
				 Yes, Toe  | 
			
				 12  | 
			
				 17.4%  | 
		|
| 
				 Yes, above the knee  | 
			
				 1  | 
			
				 1.4%  | 
		|
| 
				 Do you think that the procedure improved the level of foot health and approximately how much?  | 
			
				 No, it gets more worse  | 
			
				 5  | 
			
				 7.2%  | 
		
| 
				 There is no difference  | 
			
				 5  | 
			
				 7.2%  | 
		|
| 
				 yes, it has improved more 25%  | 
			
				 3  | 
			
				 4.3%  | 
		|
| 
				 yes, it has improved more 50%  | 
			
				 8  | 
			
				 11.6%  | 
		|
| 
				 yes, it has improved more 75%  | 
			
				 48  | 
			
				 69.6%  | 
		|
| 
				 Change in HA1C  | 
			
				 Decreased  | 
			
				 35  | 
			
				 50.7%  | 
		
| 
				 No change  | 
			
				 19  | 
			
				 27.5%  | 
		|
| 
				 Increased  | 
			
				 15  | 
			
				 21.7%  | 
		|
| 
				 Change in HA1C  | 
			
				 Decreased  | 
			
				 16  | 
			
				 23.2%  | 
		
| 
				 
  | 
			
				 No change  | 
			
				 32  | 
			
				 46.4%  | 
		
| 
				 Increased  | 
			
				 21  | 
			
				 30.4%  |